| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in D-Link DSL-320B 1.23 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file tools/tools_admin.xgi / login.xgi. Performing a manipulation results in information disclosure. In addition, an exploit is available. The affected component should be upgraded.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in D-Link DSL-320B 1.23. This affects an unknown part of the file tools/tools_admin.xgi / login.xgi. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a information disclosure vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-200. The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality.
The bug was discovered 03/17/2013. The weakness was presented 05/06/2013 by Michael Messner (m1k3) with s3cur1ty as not defined mailinglist post (Bugtraq). The advisory is shared at seclists.org. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details and a public exploit are known. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1592 for this issue.
After immediately, there has been an exploit disclosed. The exploit is shared for download at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 44 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $5k-$25k.
Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published even before and not after the disclosure of the vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Exploit-DB (25251) and OSVDB (93020†). See VDB-8609, VDB-8610, VDB-8611 and VDB-8612 for similar entries. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.dlink.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Information disclosureCWE: CWE-200 / CWE-284 / CWE-266
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exploit Delay Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/17/2013 🔍04/30/2013 🔍
05/06/2013 🔍
05/06/2013 🔍
05/07/2013 🔍
03/20/2019 🔍
Sources
Vendor: dlink.comAdvisory: seclists.org
Researcher: Michael Messner (m1k3)
Organization: s3cur1ty
Status: Not defined
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-8613
OSVDB: 93020
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 05/07/2013 12:40Updated: 03/20/2019 20:54
Changes: 05/07/2013 12:40 (50), 03/20/2019 20:54 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Committer:
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.