IBM Domino up to 9.0 Authentication improper authentication ⚔ [Disputed]
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in IBM Domino up to 9.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Authentication Handler. Performing a manipulation results in improper authentication. Additionally, an exploit exists. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The suggested workaround should be applied.
Details
A vulnerability was found in IBM Domino up to 9.0 (Groupware Software). It has been classified as critical. This affects some unknown processing of the component Authentication Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a improper authentication vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-287. When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, and integrity.
The bug was discovered 03/05/2012. The weakness was released 04/26/2013 by MustLive as not defined mailinglist post (Full-Disclosure). The advisory is shared at seclists.org. The public release happened without involvement of IBM. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available.
The exploit is shared for download at seclists.org. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 417 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $5k-$25k. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment.
The best possible mitigation is suggested to be Workaround.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at OSVDB (94159†). Entry connected to this vulnerability is available at VDB-9142. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.ibm.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.5VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Base Score: 6.5
VulDB Temp Score: 6.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Improper authenticationCWE: CWE-287
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: WorkaroundStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Workaround: Secure Webserver against Brute Force Attacks
Timeline
03/05/2012 🔍04/26/2013 🔍
06/14/2013 🔍
03/20/2019 🔍
Sources
Vendor: ibm.comAdvisory: seclists.org
Researcher: MustLive
Status: Not defined
Disputed: 🔍
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-9141
OSVDB: 94159
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 06/14/2013 12:22Updated: 03/20/2019 08:23
Changes: 06/14/2013 12:22 (51), 03/20/2019 08:23 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Committer:
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.