osCommerce 2.3.x administrators.php cross-site request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in osCommerce 2.3.x. It has been rated as problematic. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /oscommerce/admin/administrators.php. This manipulation causes cross-site request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Moreover, an exploit is present.
Details
A vulnerability was found in osCommerce 2.3.x (E-Commerce Management Software). It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown function of the file /oscommerce/admin/administrators.php. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-352. The web application does not, or can not, sufficiently verify whether a well-formed, valid, consistent request was intentionally provided by the user who submitted the request. As an impact it is known to affect integrity.
The weakness was disclosed 07/31/2011 as VL-ID 241 as not defined advisory (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at vulnerability-lab.com. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details and also a public exploit are known.
A public exploit has been developed in HTML/Javascript and been published immediately after the advisory. It is possible to download the exploit at vulnerability-lab.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. By approaching the search of inurl:oscommerce/admin/administrators.php it is possible to find vulnerable targets with Google Hacking. The code used by the exploit is:
<html> <title>Administrator Remote Exploit</title> <body onLoad=javascript:document.xsrf.submit()> <form action="http://demo.opensourcecms.com/oscommerce/admin/administrators.php?action=insert" method="post" name="xsrf"> <input type="hidden" name="username" value="GlobalEvolution"> <input type="hidden" name="password" value="Smash@GE"> <input type="hidden" id="x" value="54"> <input type="hidden" id="y" value="5"> </form> </body> </html>
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The entries VDB-91983, VDB-91984, VDB-91985 and VDB-91986 are pretty similar. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross-site request forgeryCWE: CWE-352 / CWE-862 / CWE-863
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Programming Language: 🔍
Download: 🔍
Google Hack: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exploit Delay Time: 🔍
Timeline
07/31/2011 🔍07/31/2011 🔍
08/02/2011 🔍
09/26/2016 🔍
04/25/2019 🔍
Sources
Advisory: VL-ID 241Status: Not defined
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-91987
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 09/26/2016 09:08Updated: 04/25/2019 10:25
Changes: 09/26/2016 09:08 (44), 04/25/2019 10:25 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.