docker2aci 0.12.3 Local Image input validation

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
4.0$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability has been found in docker2aci 0.12.3 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Local Image Handler. The manipulation leads to input validation. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2016-8579. The attack must be carried out locally. There is no available exploit.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in docker2aci 0.12.3 (Virtualization Software) and classified as problematic. This issue affects an unknown part of the component Local Image Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Impacted is availability. The summary by CVE is:

docker2aci <= 0.12.3 has an infinite loop when handling local images with cyclic dependency chain.

The weakness was presented 10/28/2016 (Website). The advisory is shared at securityfocus.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2016-8579. The exploitation is known to be easy. An attack has to be approached locally. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.

There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.

The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 93560†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Type

Name

Version

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.0
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.0

VulDB Base Score: 4.0
VulDB Temp Score: 4.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 4.0
NVD Vector: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Input validation
CWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

10/10/2016 🔍
10/28/2016 +18 days 🔍
10/28/2016 +0 days 🔍
10/29/2016 +1 days 🔍
09/28/2022 +2160 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Advisory: 203
Status: Not defined

CVE: CVE-2016-8579 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2016-8579
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-93173
SecurityFocus: 93560

scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20171019

Entryinfo

Created: 10/29/2016 19:07
Updated: 09/28/2022 19:59
Changes: 10/29/2016 19:07 (35), 01/27/2018 12:40 (11), 09/28/2022 19:52 (4), 09/28/2022 19:59 (9)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:E11:103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

Are you interested in using VulDB?

Download the whitepaper to learn more about our service!