Bitrix Site Manager 12.06.2015 Contact Form text cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Bitrix Site Manager 12.06.2015. This affects an unknown function of the component Contact Form. This manipulation of the argument text with the input <img src="http://1"; on onerror="$(’p').text(’Hacked’)" /> causes cross site scripting.
This vulnerability appears as CVE-2017-20122. The attack may be initiated remotely. In addition, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Bitrix Site Manager 12.06.2015. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Contact Form. The manipulation of the argument text with the input value <img src="http://1"; on onerror="$(’p').text(’Hacked’)" /> leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-80. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as "<", ">", and "&" that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages. As an impact it is known to affect integrity.
The weakness was presented 01/31/2017 as Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in Bitrix Site Manager as not defined mailinglist post (Full-Disclosure). It is possible to read the advisory at seclists.org. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2017-20122. The attack can be launched remotely. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details and also a public exploit are known. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
After immediately, there has been an exploit disclosed. It is possible to download the exploit at seclists.org. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.1VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.0
VulDB Base Score: 3.5
VulDB Temp Score: 3.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.4
NVD Vector: 🔍
CNA Base Score: 3.5
CNA Vector (VulDB): 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-80 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exploit Delay Time: 🔍
Timeline
01/31/2017 🔍01/31/2017 🔍
02/08/2017 🔍
06/27/2022 🔍
11/12/2022 🔍
Sources
Advisory: Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in Bitrix Site ManagerStatus: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-20122 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-20122
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-96643
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 02/08/2017 10:47Updated: 11/12/2022 07:23
Changes: 02/08/2017 10:47 (42), 08/11/2020 18:58 (1), 06/27/2022 23:55 (4), 11/12/2022 07:17 (2), 11/12/2022 07:23 (28)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.