Lithium Forum 2017 Q1 Compose Message upload_url server-side request forgery
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Lithium Forum 2017 Q1. It has been rated as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Compose Message Handler. The manipulation of the argument upload_url leads to server-side request forgery. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2017-20106. Furthermore, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Lithium Forum 2017 Q1 (Forum Software). This issue affects an unknown function of the component Compose Message Handler. The manipulation of the argument upload_url with an unknown input leads to a server-side request forgery vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-918. The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The weakness was published 02/20/2017 by Vibhuti R V Nath as VL-ID 2030 as not defined advisory (Website). The advisory is shared at vulnerability-lab.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2017-20106. Technical details as well as a public exploit are known.
After immediately, there has been an exploit disclosed. The exploit is available at vulnerability-lab.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Base Score: 5.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.8
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Server-side request forgeryCWE: CWE-918
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exploit Delay Time: 🔍
Timeline
02/20/2017 🔍02/20/2017 🔍
02/24/2017 🔍
06/25/2022 🔍
Sources
Advisory: VL-ID 2030Researcher: Vibhuti R V Nath
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-20106 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-20106
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-97265
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 02/24/2017 15:59Updated: 06/25/2022 18:21
Changes: 02/24/2017 15:59 (43), 08/17/2020 10:27 (2), 06/25/2022 18:21 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.