| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability categorized as problematic has been discovered in OpenBSD 5.8/5.9. The impacted element is the function __MAP_NOFAULT. Executing a manipulation of the argument size can lead to input validation.
This vulnerability appears as CVE-2016-6239. The attack requires local access. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in OpenBSD 5.8/5.9 (Operating System). This vulnerability affects the function __MAP_NOFAULT. The manipulation of the argument size with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. As an impact it is known to affect availability. CVE summarizes:
The mmap extension __MAP_NOFAULT in OpenBSD 5.8 and 5.9 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (kernel panic and crash) via a large size value.
The bug was discovered 06/27/2016. The weakness was presented 03/07/2017 by Jesse Hertz (oss-sec). The advisory is shared for download at openwall.com. This vulnerability was named CVE-2016-6239 since 07/17/2016. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack needs to be approached locally. No form of authentication is required for a successful exploitation. There are known technical details, but no exploit is available. The current price for an exploit might be approx. USD $0-$5k (estimation calculated on 12/05/2024).
The vulnerability was handled as a non-public zero-day exploit for at least 253 days. During that time the estimated underground price was around $0-$5k.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 91805†) and SecurityTracker (ID 1036318†). See VDB-97589, VDB-97590, VDB-97591 and VDB-97592 for similar entries. Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.9
VulDB Base Score: 6.2
VulDB Temp Score: 6.2
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 5.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Input validationCWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
06/27/2016 🔍07/17/2016 🔍
07/17/2016 🔍
03/07/2017 🔍
03/07/2017 🔍
03/07/2017 🔍
12/05/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: openwall.comResearcher: Jesse Hertz
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2016-6239 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2016-6239
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-97588
SecurityFocus: 91805 - OpenBSD Multiple Memory Corruption and Denial of Service Vulnerabilities
OSVDB: - CVE-2016-6239 - OpenBSD - Denial of Service Issue
SecurityTracker: 1036318
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/07/2017 21:54Updated: 12/05/2024 15:03
Changes: 03/07/2017 21:54 (61), 09/04/2020 12:22 (5), 12/05/2024 15:03 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.