paintballrefjosh MaNGOSWebV4 4.0.8 linkid Reflected cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability marked as problematic has been reported in paintballrefjosh MaNGOSWebV4 4.0.8. This impacts an unknown function of the file paintballrefjosh/MaNGOSWebV4. This manipulation of the argument linkid causes cross site scripting (Reflected). This vulnerability appears as CVE-2017-6810. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in paintballrefjosh MaNGOSWebV4 4.0.8 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code of the file paintballrefjosh/MaNGOSWebV4. The manipulation of the argument linkid with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability (Reflected). The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
paintballrefjosh/MaNGOSWebV4 4.0.8 is vulnerable to a reflected XSS in inc/admin/template_files/admin.fplinks.php (linkid parameter).
The bug was discovered 03/11/2017. The weakness was presented 03/11/2017 (GitHub Repository). It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2017-6810 since 03/11/2017. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 96939†). See VDB-97841, VDB-97842, VDB-97844 and VDB-97845 for similar entries. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: ReflectedClass: Cross site scripting / Reflected
CWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/11/2017 🔍03/11/2017 🔍
03/11/2017 🔍
03/11/2017 🔍
03/11/2017 🔍
03/11/2017 🔍
09/06/2020 🔍
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2017-6810 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-6810
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-97843
SecurityFocus: 96939 - MaNGOSWebV4 Multiple Cross Site Scripting Vulnerabilities
OSVDB: - CVE-2017-6810 - MaNGOSWebV4 - Cross-Site Scripting Issue
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/11/2017 18:27Updated: 09/06/2020 07:14
Changes: 03/11/2017 18:27 (60), 09/06/2020 07:14 (5)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.