paintballrefjosh MaNGOSWebV4 4.0.8 ID Reflected cross site scripting
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.8 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in paintballrefjosh MaNGOSWebV4 4.0.8. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file paintballrefjosh/MaNGOSWebV4. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in cross site scripting (Reflected). This vulnerability is known as CVE-2017-6812. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in paintballrefjosh MaNGOSWebV4 4.0.8. It has been classified as problematic. This affects some unknown processing of the file paintballrefjosh/MaNGOSWebV4. The manipulation of the argument id with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability (Reflected). CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:
paintballrefjosh/MaNGOSWebV4 4.0.8 is vulnerable to a reflected XSS in inc/admin/template_files/admin.vote.php (id parameter).
The bug was discovered 03/11/2017. The weakness was published 03/11/2017 (GitHub Repository). The advisory is shared at github.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2017-6812 since 03/11/2017. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1059.007 for this issue.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 96939†). Similar entries are available at VDB-97841, VDB-97842, VDB-97843 and VDB-97844. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
Website
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.2VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.0
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.1
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Name: ReflectedClass: Cross site scripting / Reflected
CWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
03/11/2017 🔍03/11/2017 🔍
03/11/2017 🔍
03/11/2017 🔍
03/11/2017 🔍
03/11/2017 🔍
09/06/2020 🔍
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: github.com
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2017-6812 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-6812
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-97845
SecurityFocus: 96939 - MaNGOSWebV4 Multiple Cross Site Scripting Vulnerabilities
OSVDB: - CVE-2017-6812 - MaNGOSWebV4 - Cross-Site Scripting Issue
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/11/2017 18:28Updated: 09/06/2020 07:55
Changes: 03/11/2017 18:28 (60), 09/06/2020 07:55 (5)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.