libdwarf dwarf_leb.c dwarf_decode_s_leb128_chk input validation
CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
---|---|---|
5.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in libdwarf. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is the function dwarf_decode_s_leb128_chk
of the file dwarf_leb.c. The manipulation leads to input validation.
This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2017-9998. The attack may be launched remotely. There is no exploit available.
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Details
A vulnerability was found in libdwarf (Programming Tool Software) (affected version not known). It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function dwarf_decode_s_leb128_chk
of the file dwarf_leb.c. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a input validation vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-20. The product receives input or data, but it does
not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the
properties that are required to process the data safely and
correctly. As an impact it is known to affect availability. The summary by CVE is:
The _dwarf_decode_s_leb128_chk function in dwarf_leb.c in libdwarf through 2017-06-28 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (Segmentation fault) via a crafted file.
The bug was discovered 06/28/2017. The weakness was published 06/28/2017 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at securityfocus.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2017-9998 since 06/28/2017. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 99310†). Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.4
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 6.5
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Input validationCWE: CWE-20
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
0-Day | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
---|---|---|---|---|
Today | unlock | unlock | unlock | unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
06/28/2017 🔍06/28/2017 🔍
06/28/2017 🔍
06/28/2017 🔍
06/28/2017 🔍
06/28/2017 🔍
12/30/2020 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securityfocus.com⛔Researcher: OWL337
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2017-9998 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2017-9998
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-102895
SecurityFocus: 99310 - Libdwarf CVE-2017-9998 Remote Denial Of Service Vulnerability
Entry
Created: 06/28/2017 16:41Updated: 12/30/2020 07:18
Changes: 06/28/2017 16:41 (57), 10/21/2019 09:18 (3), 12/30/2020 07:18 (3)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:0F3:103
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.