Openssl Vulnerabilities

Timeline

The analysis of the timeline helps to identify the required approach and handling of single vulnerabilities and vulnerability collections. This overview makes it possible to see less important slices and more severe hotspots at a glance. Initiating immediate vulnerability response and prioritizing of issues is possible.

Last Year

The analysis of the timeline helps to identify the required approach and handling of single vulnerabilities and vulnerability collections. This overview makes it possible to see less important slices and more severe hotspots at a glance. Initiating immediate vulnerability response and prioritizing of issues is possible.

Version

1.0.268
1.0.160
0.9.855
1.0.048
1.0.0a35

Grouping all affected versions of a specific product helps to determine existing issues. This makes it possible to determine vendors and products which need attention when it comes to remediations.

Remediation

Official Fix232
Temporary Fix0
Workaround0
Unavailable2
Not Defined21

Vendors and researchers are eager to find countermeasures to mitigate security vulnerabilities. These can be distinguished between multiple forms and levels of remediation which influence risks differently.

Exploitability

High7
Functional1
Proof-of-Concept47
Unproven56
Not Defined144

Researcher and attacker which are looking for security vulnerabilities try to exploit them for academic purposes or personal gain. The level and quality of exploitability can be distinguished to determine simplicity and strength of attacks.

Access Vector

Not Defined0
Physical0
Local10
Adjacent5
Network240

The approach a vulnerability it becomes important to use the expected access vector. This is typically via the network, local, or physically even.

Authentication

Not Defined0
High0
Low17
None238

To exploit a vulnerability a certail level of authentication might be required. Vulnerabilities without such a requirement are much more popular.

User Interaction

Not Defined0
Required2
None253

Some attack scenarios require some user interaction by a victim. This is typical for phishing, social engineering and cross site scripting attacks.

C3BM Index

Our unique C3BM Index (CVSSv3 Base Meta Index) cumulates the CVSSv3 Meta Base Scores of all entries over time. Comparing this index to the amount of disclosed vulnerabilities helps to pinpoint the most important events.

Last Year

Our unique C3BM Index (CVSSv3 Base Meta Index) cumulates the CVSSv3 Meta Base Scores of all entries over time. Comparing this index to the amount of disclosed vulnerabilities helps to pinpoint the most important events.

CVSSv3 Base

≤10
≤20
≤31
≤418
≤512
≤6102
≤740
≤856
≤910
≤1016

The Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) is an industry standard to define the characteristics and impacts of security vulnerabilities. The base score represents the intrinsic aspects that are constant over time and across user environments. Our unique meta score merges all available scores from different sources to aggregate to the most reliable result.

CVSSv3 Temp

≤10
≤20
≤33
≤416
≤547
≤675
≤771
≤819
≤913
≤1011

The Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) uses temp scores to reflect the characteristics of a vulnerability that may change over time but not across user environments. This includes reporting confidence, exploitability and remediation levels. We do also provide our unique meta score for temp scores, even though other sources rarely publish them.

VulDB

≤10
≤20
≤31
≤430
≤58
≤6117
≤713
≤861
≤91
≤1024

The moderation team is always defining the base vector and base score for an entry. These and all other available scores are used to generate the meta score.

NVD

≤10
≤20
≤30
≤44
≤51
≤628
≤74
≤845
≤92
≤1016

The National Vulnerability Database (NVD) is also defining CVSS vectors and scores. These are usually not complete and might differ from VulDB scores.

CNA

≤10
≤20
≤30
≤40
≤50
≤61
≤70
≤80
≤90
≤100

A CVE Numbering Authority (CNA) is responsible for assigning new CVE entries. They might also include a CVSS score. These are usually not complete and might differ from VulDB scores.

Vendor

≤10
≤20
≤30
≤40
≤50
≤60
≤70
≤80
≤90
≤100

Some vendors are willing to publish their own CVSS vectors and scores for vulnerabilities in their products. The coverage varies from vendor to vendor.

Research

≤10
≤20
≤30
≤40
≤50
≤60
≤70
≤80
≤90
≤100

There are sometimes also security researcher which provide their own CVSS vectors and scores for vulnerabilities they have found and published.

Exploit 0-day

<1k0
<2k1
<5k4
<10k12
<25k159
<50k59
<100k18
≥100k2

The moderation team is working with the threat intelligence team to determine prices for exploits. Our unique algorithm is used to identify the 0-day prices for an exploit, before it got distributed or became public. Calculated prices are aligned to prices disclosed by vulnerability broker and compared to prices we see on exploit markets.

Exploit Today

<1k173
<2k10
<5k36
<10k20
<25k15
<50k1
<100k0
≥100k0

The 0-day prices do not consider time-relevant factors. The today price does reflect price impacts like disclosure of vulnerability details, alternative exploits, availability of countermeasures. These dynamic aspects might decrease the exploit prices over time. Under certain circumstances this happens very fast.

Exploit Market Volume

Our unique calculation of exploit prices makes it possible to forecast the expected exploit market volume. The calculated prices for all possible 0-day expoits are cumulated for this task. Comparing the volume to the amount of disclosed vulnerabilities helps to pinpoint the most important events.

Last Year

Our unique calculation of exploit prices makes it possible to forecast the expected exploit market volume. The calculated prices for all possible 0-day expoits are cumulated for this task. Comparing the volume to the amount of disclosed vulnerabilities helps to pinpoint the most important events.

🔴 CTI Activities

Our unique Cyber Threat Intelligence aims to determine the ongoing research of actors to anticipiate their acitivities. Observing exploit markets on the Darknet, discussions of vulnerabilities on mailinglists, and exchanges on social media makes it possible to identify planned attacks. Monitored actors and activities are classified whether they are offensive or defensive. They are also weighted as some actors are well-known for certain products and technologies. And some of their disclosures might contain more or less details about technical aspects and personal context. The world map highlights active actors in real-time.

Affected Versions (204): 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.5.1, 0.5.2, 0.5.3, 0.5.4, 0.5.5, 0.5.6, 0.5.7, 0.5.8, 0.5.9, 0.5.11, 0.5.12, 0.5.13, 0.5.14, 0.5.15, 0.5.16, 0.5.17, 0.5.18, 0.6, 0.7, 0.7.7-1, 0.8, 0.9, 0.9.1c, 0.9.2b, 0.9.3, 0.9.3a, 0.9.4, 0.9.5, 0.9.5a, 0.9.6, 0.9.6-15, 0.9.6a, 0.9.6b, 0.9.6b-3, 0.9.6c, 0.9.6d, 0.9.6e, 0.9.6f, 0.9.6g, 0.9.6h, 0.9.6i, 0.9.6j, 0.9.6k, 0.9.6l, 0.9.6m, 0.9.7, 0.9.7a, 0.9.7a-2, 0.9.7b, 0.9.7c, 0.9.7d, 0.9.7e, 0.9.7f, 0.9.7g, 0.9.7h, 0.9.7i, 0.9.7j, 0.9.7k, 0.9.7l, 0.9.8, 0.9.8a, 0.9.8b, 0.9.8c, 0.9.8d, 0.9.8e, 0.9.8f, 0.9.8f-4, 0.9.8g, 0.9.8h, 0.9.8i, 0.9.8j, 0.9.8k, 0.9.8l, 0.9.8m, 0.9.8n, 0.9.8o, 0.9.8p, 0.9.8q, 0.9.8r, 0.9.8s, 0.9.8t, 0.9.8u, 0.9.8v, 0.9.8w, 0.9.8zb, 0.9.8zc, 0.9.8zg, 0.10.1, 0.10.2, 0.10.3, 0.10.4, 0.10.5, 0.10.6, 0.10.7, 0.10.8, 1, 1.0, 1.0.0a, 1.0.0b, 1.0.0c, 1.0.0d, 1.0.0e, 1.0.0f, 1.0.0g, 1.0.0h, 1.0.0i, 1.0.0j, 1.0.0k, 1.0.0l, 1.0.0m, 1.0.0n, 1.0.0o, 1.0.0q, 1.0.0s, 1.0.1, 1.0.1a, 1.0.1b, 1.0.1c, 1.0.1d, 1.0.1e, 1.0.1e-25.el7, 1.0.1f, 1.0.1g, 1.0.1h, 1.0.1i, 1.0.1j, 1.0.1k, 1.0.1l, 1.0.1n, 1.0.1o, 1.0.1p, 1.0.1r, 1.0.1s, 1.0.1t, 1.0.1u, 1.0.2, 1.0.2a, 1.0.2b, 1.0.2c, 1.0.2d, 1.0.2e, 1.0.2f, 1.0.2g, 1.0.2h, 1.0.2i, 1.0.2j, 1.0.2k, 1.0.2l, 1.0.2m, 1.0.2n, 1.0.2o, 1.0.2p, 1.0.2q, 1.0.2r, 1.0.2s, 1.0.2t, 1.0.2v, 1.0.2w, 1.0.2y, 1.0.2zc, 1.0.2zd, 1.0.2ze, 1.1, 1.1.0a, 1.1.0b, 1.1.0c, 1.1.0d, 1.1.0e, 1.1.0f, 1.1.0g, 1.1.0h, 1.1.0i, 1.1.0j, 1.1.0k, 1.1.1, 1.1.1a, 1.1.1b, 1.1.1c, 1.1.1d, 1.1.1e, 1.1.1f, 1.1.1h, 1.1.1i, 1.1.1j, 1.1.1k, 1.1.1l, 1.1.1m, 1.1.1n, 1.1.1o, 1.1.1p, 1.1.2, 3, 3.0, 3.0.1, 3.0.2, 3.0.3, 3.0.4, 3.0.5, 3.0.6

Link to Product Website: https://www.openssl.org/

Software Type: Network Encryption Software

PublishedBaseTempVulnerability0dayTodayExpRemCTICVE
11/01/20225.65.1OpenSSL X.509 Certificate buffer overflow$25k-$100k$0-$5kProof-of-ConceptOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2022-3602
11/01/20225.04.8OpenSSL x.509 Certificate buffer overflow$25k-$100k$5k-$25kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2022-3786
10/11/20225.65.5OpenSSL Custom Cipher EVP_CIPHER_meth_new missing encryption$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2022-3358
07/05/20225.65.5OpenSSL AES OCB Mode missing encryption$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.07CVE-2022-2097
07/01/20229.89.6OpenSSL RSA Private Key rsaz_exp_x2.c ossl_rsaz_mod_exp_avx512_x2 memory corruption$100k and more$25k-$100kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.20CVE-2022-2274
06/22/20226.36.0OpenSSL Incomplete Fix CVE-2022-1292 c_rehash os command injection$25k-$100k$5k-$25kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.07CVE-2022-2068
05/03/20225.65.4OpenSSL RC4-MD5 data authenticity$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.05CVE-2022-1434
05/03/20227.37.0OpenSSL OCSP Response OCSP_basic_verify certificate validation$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.04CVE-2022-1343
05/03/20225.35.1OpenSSL Hash Table OPENSSL_LH_flush resource consumption$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.04CVE-2022-1473
05/03/20225.55.3OpenSSL c_rehash os command injection$5k-$25k$5k-$25kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.05CVE-2022-1292
03/24/20225.55.5OpenSSL CMAC_Final permission$5k-$25k$5k-$25kNot DefinedNot Defined0.03CVE-2021-43085
03/15/20226.46.3OpenSSL Non-prime Moduli BN_mod_sqrt infinite loop$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.07CVE-2022-0778
01/29/20223.13.0OpenSSL EC information disclosure$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2021-4160
12/14/20213.73.6OpenSSL libssl X509_verify_cert denial of service$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.04CVE-2021-4044
08/24/20217.37.0OpenSSL SM2 Data EVP_PKEY_decrypt buffer overflow$25k-$100k$5k-$25kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.03CVE-2021-3711
08/24/20213.73.6OpenSSL ASN.1 X509_get1_ocsp out-of-bounds$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.04CVE-2021-3712
03/26/20216.56.2OpenSSL Certificate Chain Verification certificate validation$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.04CVE-2021-3450
03/26/20215.65.4OpenSSL TLS Server denial of service$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.06CVE-2021-3449
02/16/20216.46.1OpenSSL EVP_DecryptUpdate return value$25k-$100k$5k-$25kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2021-23841
02/16/20216.46.1OpenSSL EVP_DecryptUpdate return value$25k-$100k$5k-$25kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.03CVE-2021-23840
02/16/20215.65.4OpenSSL RSA Signature inadequate encryption$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.03CVE-2021-23839
12/08/20205.55.3OpenSSL x509 Certificate GENERAL_NAME_cmp null pointer dereference$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.04CVE-2020-1971
10/06/20205.55.3WildFly OpenSSL HTTP Session memory leak$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.03CVE-2020-25644
09/09/20203.73.6OpenSSL TLS inadequate encryption$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.03CVE-2020-1968
04/21/20206.46.1OpenSSL TLS 1.3 Handshake SSL_check_chain null pointer dereference$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.05CVE-2020-1967

230 more entries are not shown

Might our Artificial Intelligence support you?

Check our Alexa App!