Openssl Vulnerabilities

Timeline

The analysis of the timeline helps to identify the required approach and handling of single vulnerabilities and vulnerability collections. This overview makes it possible to see less important slices and more severe hotspots at a glance. Initiating immediate vulnerability response and prioritizing of issues is possible.

Last Year

The analysis of the timeline helps to identify the required approach and handling of single vulnerabilities and vulnerability collections. This overview makes it possible to see less important slices and more severe hotspots at a glance. Initiating immediate vulnerability response and prioritizing of issues is possible.

Version

1.0.271
1.0.160
0.9.855
1.0.048
1.0.1a41

Grouping all affected versions of a specific product helps to determine existing issues. This makes it possible to determine vendors and products which need attention when it comes to remediations.

Remediation

Official Fix260
Temporary Fix0
Workaround0
Unavailable2
Not Defined22

Vendors and researchers are eager to find countermeasures to mitigate security vulnerabilities. These can be distinguished between multiple forms and levels of remediation which influence risks differently.

Exploitability

High7
Functional1
Proof-of-Concept47
Unproven56
Not Defined173

Researcher and attacker which are looking for security vulnerabilities try to exploit them for academic purposes or personal gain. The level and quality of exploitability can be distinguished to determine simplicity and strength of attacks.

Access Vector

Not Defined0
Physical0
Local10
Adjacent8
Network266

The approach a vulnerability it becomes important to use the expected access vector. This is typically via the network, local, or physically even.

Authentication

Not Defined0
High0
Low22
None262

To exploit a vulnerability a certail level of authentication might be required. Vulnerabilities without such a requirement are much more popular.

User Interaction

Not Defined0
Required4
None280

Some attack scenarios require some user interaction by a victim. This is typical for phishing, social engineering and cross site scripting attacks.

C3BM Index

Our unique C3BM Index (CVSSv3 Base Meta Index) cumulates the CVSSv3 Meta Base Scores of all entries over time. Comparing this index to the amount of disclosed vulnerabilities helps to pinpoint the most important events.

Last Year

Our unique C3BM Index (CVSSv3 Base Meta Index) cumulates the CVSSv3 Meta Base Scores of all entries over time. Comparing this index to the amount of disclosed vulnerabilities helps to pinpoint the most important events.

CVSSv3 Base

≤10
≤20
≤31
≤420
≤512
≤6119
≤748
≤858
≤910
≤1016

The Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) is an industry standard to define the characteristics and impacts of security vulnerabilities. The base score represents the intrinsic aspects that are constant over time and across user environments. Our unique meta score merges all available scores from different sources to aggregate to the most reliable result.

CVSSv3 Temp

≤10
≤20
≤33
≤418
≤546
≤693
≤779
≤821
≤913
≤1011

The Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) uses temp scores to reflect the characteristics of a vulnerability that may change over time but not across user environments. This includes reporting confidence, exploitability and remediation levels. We do also provide our unique meta score for temp scores, even though other sources rarely publish them.

VulDB

≤10
≤20
≤31
≤435
≤59
≤6138
≤714
≤862
≤91
≤1024

The moderation team is always defining the base vector and base score for an entry. These and all other available scores are used to generate the meta score.

NVD

≤10
≤20
≤30
≤44
≤51
≤636
≤75
≤856
≤93
≤1017

The National Vulnerability Database (NVD) is also defining CVSS vectors and scores. These are usually not complete and might differ from VulDB scores.

CNA

≤10
≤20
≤30
≤40
≤50
≤61
≤70
≤81
≤90
≤100

A CVE Numbering Authority (CNA) is responsible for assigning new CVE entries. They might also include a CVSS score. These are usually not complete and might differ from VulDB scores.

Vendor

≤10
≤20
≤30
≤40
≤50
≤60
≤70
≤80
≤90
≤100

Some vendors are willing to publish their own CVSS vectors and scores for vulnerabilities in their products. The coverage varies from vendor to vendor.

Research

≤10
≤20
≤30
≤40
≤50
≤60
≤70
≤80
≤90
≤100

There are sometimes also security researcher which provide their own CVSS vectors and scores for vulnerabilities they have found and published.

Exploit 0-day

<1k0
<2k3
<5k4
<10k13
<25k192
<50k52
<100k18
≥100k2

The moderation team is working with the threat intelligence team to determine prices for exploits. Our unique algorithm is used to identify the 0-day prices for an exploit, before it got distributed or became public. Calculated prices are aligned to prices disclosed by vulnerability broker and compared to prices we see on exploit markets.

Exploit Today

<1k203
<2k16
<5k30
<10k24
<25k10
<50k1
<100k0
≥100k0

The 0-day prices do not consider time-relevant factors. The today price does reflect price impacts like disclosure of vulnerability details, alternative exploits, availability of countermeasures. These dynamic aspects might decrease the exploit prices over time. Under certain circumstances this happens very fast.

Exploit Market Volume

Our unique calculation of exploit prices makes it possible to forecast the expected exploit market volume. The calculated prices for all possible 0-day expoits are cumulated for this task. Comparing the volume to the amount of disclosed vulnerabilities helps to pinpoint the most important events.

Last Year

Our unique calculation of exploit prices makes it possible to forecast the expected exploit market volume. The calculated prices for all possible 0-day expoits are cumulated for this task. Comparing the volume to the amount of disclosed vulnerabilities helps to pinpoint the most important events.

🔴 CTI Activities

Our unique Cyber Threat Intelligence aims to determine the ongoing research of actors to anticipiate their acitivities. Observing exploit markets on the Darknet, discussions of vulnerabilities on mailinglists, and exchanges on social media makes it possible to identify planned attacks. Monitored actors and activities are classified whether they are offensive or defensive. They are also weighted as some actors are well-known for certain products and technologies. And some of their disclosures might contain more or less details about technical aspects and personal context. The world map highlights active actors in real-time.

Affected Versions (243): 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.5.1, 0.5.2, 0.5.3, 0.5.4, 0.5.5, 0.5.6, 0.5.7, 0.5.8, 0.5.9, 0.5.11, 0.5.12, 0.5.13, 0.5.14, 0.5.15, 0.5.16, 0.5.17, 0.5.18, 0.6, 0.7, 0.7.7-1, 0.8, 0.9, 0.9.1c, 0.9.2b, 0.9.3, 0.9.3a, 0.9.4, 0.9.5, 0.9.5a, 0.9.6, 0.9.6-15, 0.9.6a, 0.9.6b, 0.9.6b-3, 0.9.6c, 0.9.6d, 0.9.6e, 0.9.6f, 0.9.6g, 0.9.6h, 0.9.6i, 0.9.6j, 0.9.6k, 0.9.6l, 0.9.6m, 0.9.7, 0.9.7a, 0.9.7a-2, 0.9.7b, 0.9.7c, 0.9.7d, 0.9.7e, 0.9.7f, 0.9.7g, 0.9.7h, 0.9.7i, 0.9.7j, 0.9.7k, 0.9.7l, 0.9.8, 0.9.8a, 0.9.8b, 0.9.8c, 0.9.8d, 0.9.8e, 0.9.8f, 0.9.8f-4, 0.9.8g, 0.9.8h, 0.9.8i, 0.9.8j, 0.9.8k, 0.9.8l, 0.9.8m, 0.9.8n, 0.9.8o, 0.9.8p, 0.9.8q, 0.9.8r, 0.9.8s, 0.9.8t, 0.9.8u, 0.9.8v, 0.9.8w, 0.9.8za, 0.9.8zb, 0.9.8zc, 0.9.8zd, 0.9.8ze, 0.9.8zf, 0.9.8zg, 0.10.1, 0.10.2, 0.10.3, 0.10.4, 0.10.5, 0.10.6, 0.10.7, 0.10.8, 1, 1.0, 1.0.0a, 1.0.0b, 1.0.0c, 1.0.0d, 1.0.0e, 1.0.0f, 1.0.0g, 1.0.0h, 1.0.0i, 1.0.0j, 1.0.0k, 1.0.0l, 1.0.0m, 1.0.0n, 1.0.0o, 1.0.0p, 1.0.0q, 1.0.0r, 1.0.0s, 1.0.1, 1.0.1a, 1.0.1b, 1.0.1c, 1.0.1d, 1.0.1e, 1.0.1e-25.el7, 1.0.1f, 1.0.1g, 1.0.1h, 1.0.1i, 1.0.1j, 1.0.1k, 1.0.1l, 1.0.1m, 1.0.1n, 1.0.1o, 1.0.1p, 1.0.1q, 1.0.1r, 1.0.1s, 1.0.1t, 1.0.1u, 1.0.2, 1.0.2a, 1.0.2b, 1.0.2c, 1.0.2d, 1.0.2e, 1.0.2f, 1.0.2g, 1.0.2h, 1.0.2i, 1.0.2j, 1.0.2k, 1.0.2l, 1.0.2m, 1.0.2n, 1.0.2o, 1.0.2p, 1.0.2q, 1.0.2r, 1.0.2s, 1.0.2t, 1.0.2u, 1.0.2v, 1.0.2w, 1.0.2y, 1.0.2za, 1.0.2zb, 1.0.2zc, 1.0.2zd, 1.0.2ze, 1.0.2zf, 1.0.2zg, 1.0.2zh, 1.0.2zi, 1.1, 1.1.0a, 1.1.0b, 1.1.0c, 1.1.0d, 1.1.0e, 1.1.0f, 1.1.0g, 1.1.0h, 1.1.0i, 1.1.0j, 1.1.0k, 1.1.1, 1.1.1a, 1.1.1b, 1.1.1c, 1.1.1d, 1.1.1e, 1.1.1f, 1.1.1g, 1.1.1h, 1.1.1i, 1.1.1j, 1.1.1k, 1.1.1l, 1.1.1m, 1.1.1n, 1.1.1o, 1.1.1p, 1.1.1q, 1.1.1r, 1.1.1s, 1.1.1t, 1.1.1u, 1.1.1v, 1.1.1w, 1.1.2, 1.5, 2.0, 3, 3.0, 3.0.1, 3.0.2, 3.0.3, 3.0.4, 3.0.5, 3.0.6, 3.0.7, 3.0.8, 3.0.9, 3.0.11, 3.0.12, 3.0.13, 3.1, 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.1.3, 3.1.4, 3.1.5, 3.2, 3.2.1

Link to Product Website: https://www.openssl.org/

Software Type: Network Encryption Software

PublishedBaseTempVulnerability0dayTodayExpRemCTICVE
04/08/20245.35.1OpenSSL TLSv1.3 denial of service$5k-$25k$5k-$25kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.05CVE-2024-2511
04/04/20243.73.7rust-openssl PKCS 1.5 RSA Encryption Padding Mode timing discrepancy$5k-$25k$5k-$25kNot DefinedNot Defined0.00CVE-2024-3296
03/18/20243.73.7Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA PKCS#1 Padding Marvin Attack timing discrepancy$0-$5k$0-$5kNot DefinedNot Defined0.04CVE-2024-2467
01/25/20245.45.3OpenSSL null pointer dereference$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.08CVE-2024-0727
01/15/20245.35.1OpenSSL RSA Public Key EVP_PKEY_public_check denial of service$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.03CVE-2023-6237
01/09/20246.05.9OpenSSL POLY1305 MAC improper authentication$5k-$25k$5k-$25kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.06CVE-2023-6129
11/23/20237.67.5node-openssl command injection$5k-$25k$5k-$25kNot DefinedNot Defined0.00CVE-2023-49210
11/06/20235.35.2OpenSSL X9.42 DH Keys dh_check.c DH_generate_key iteration$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2023-5678
10/24/20235.55.3OpenSSL Length EVP_CipherInit_ex2 buffer over-read$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.05CVE-2023-5363
09/08/20237.06.9OpenSSL POLY1305 MAC poly1305-x86_64.pl state issue$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2023-4807
07/31/20235.35.2OpenSSL DH Key dh_check.c DH_check denial of service$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.02CVE-2023-3817
07/19/20235.35.2OpenSSL DH Key dh_check.c DH_check denial of service$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.02CVE-2023-3446
07/14/20235.55.4OpenSSL AES-SIV Mode cipher_aes_siv.c siv_cipher improper authentication$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.02CVE-2023-2975
05/30/20235.65.5OpenSSL ASN.1 Object Identifier Translation obj_dat.c OBJ_obj2txt denial of service$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.03CVE-2023-2650
05/10/20237.97.8Intel QAT Engine for OpenSSL buffer overflow$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2022-43507
04/20/20235.65.5OpenSSL AES-XTS aesv8-armx.pl denial of service$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2023-1255
03/28/20235.55.4OpenSSL Certificate Policy Check X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy certificate validation$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2023-0466
03/28/20235.65.4OpenSSL Leaf Certificate x509_vfy.c check_policy certificate validation$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2023-0465
03/22/20235.35.2OpenSSL X.509 Certificate X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies resource consumption$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.03CVE-2023-0464
02/07/20236.46.3OpenSSL PKCS7 Data Verification null pointer dereference$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.02CVE-2023-0401
02/07/20236.46.3OpenSSL DSA Public Key EVP_PKEY_public_check null pointer dereference$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2023-0217
02/07/20235.35.1OpenSSL d2i_PKCS7_fp null pointer dereference$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.02CVE-2023-0216
02/07/20236.56.4OpenSSL PEM File PEM_read_bio_ex double free$5k-$25k$5k-$25kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.04CVE-2022-4450
02/07/20236.56.4OpenSSL ASN.1 Data BIO_new_NDEF use after free$5k-$25k$0-$5kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2023-0215
02/07/20235.65.4OpenSSL X.509 Certificate Verification buffer overflow$5k-$25k$5k-$25kNot DefinedOfficial Fix0.00CVE-2022-4203

259 more entries are not shown

Do you want to use VulDB in your project?

Use the official API to access entries easily!