CVE-2012-5602 in Wireshark
Summary
by MITRE
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6058. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2012-6058. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-6058 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 12/29/2024
This CVE entry represents a duplicate reservation number that was officially rejected and superseded by CVE-2012-6058 within the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures catalog. The rejection occurred due to the duplicate nature of the candidate number, which had been mistakenly reserved for the same vulnerability that was already properly documented under CVE-2012-6058. This type of duplicate reservation represents a procedural error in the CVE assignment process that could potentially cause confusion in vulnerability management systems and security databases. The duplicate candidate number was intentionally invalidated to maintain the integrity of the CVE namespace and prevent any potential misattribution of security information.
The rejection of this candidate number demonstrates the importance of proper CVE coordination and assignment procedures within the cybersecurity community. When duplicate numbers are identified, they must be formally rejected to maintain the accuracy of vulnerability databases and prevent confusion among security professionals who rely on these identifiers for threat intelligence and remediation planning. The replacement of the duplicate with CVE-2012-6058 ensures that all subsequent references and research efforts point to the correct vulnerability identification number.
Security organizations and vulnerability management systems must be aware of such duplicate reservations when processing CVE data to avoid potential conflicts in their tracking and remediation processes. The proper handling of rejected CVE candidates ensures that security teams can accurately correlate threat data and maintain consistent vulnerability inventories. This particular case highlights the need for robust validation processes during CVE assignment to prevent such duplication errors that could impact the reliability of security information exchanges between vendors, researchers, and organizations.
The technical implications of such duplicate CVE entries extend beyond simple numbering conflicts, as they can affect automated vulnerability scanning tools, security information and event management systems, and threat intelligence platforms that depend on accurate CVE identifiers for proper correlation and response. Organizations maintaining vulnerability databases must implement checks to identify and exclude rejected CVE candidates from their systems to maintain data integrity and prevent false positives in security assessments. This incident underscores the critical importance of maintaining accurate and consistent vulnerability identification standards across the cybersecurity ecosystem.
Industry standards such as those defined in the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) and the MITRE ATT&CK framework emphasize the importance of accurate vulnerability identification and categorization for effective security operations. While this specific CVE entry does not represent an actual vulnerability, the process of identifying and rejecting duplicate candidates aligns with best practices for maintaining the quality and reliability of vulnerability databases. The rejection of CVE-2012-5602 serves as a reminder to the security community about the importance of proper CVE coordination and the need for continuous monitoring of CVE assignments to prevent such procedural errors from impacting security operations and threat intelligence activities.