CVE-2024-10135 in CDG
Summary
by MITRE • 10/19/2024
A vulnerability was found in ESAFENET CDG 5. It has been classified as critical. This affects the function actionDelNetSecConfig of the file /com/esafenet/servlet/netSec/NetSecConfigService.java. The manipulation of the argument id leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/19/2024
The vulnerability identified as CVE-2024-10135 represents a critical sql injection flaw within the ESAFENET CDG 5 system, specifically targeting the actionDelNetSecConfig function located in the NetSecConfigService.java file. This vulnerability exists at the application layer and demonstrates a classic improper input validation issue that allows attackers to manipulate database queries through maliciously crafted input parameters. The affected parameter id serves as the primary attack vector, enabling unauthorized individuals to inject malicious sql commands that can be executed against the underlying database system. The vulnerability's classification as critical underscores its potential for severe impact, as sql injection attacks can lead to complete database compromise, data exfiltration, and unauthorized access to sensitive information systems.
The technical exploitation of this vulnerability occurs through remote access methods, eliminating the need for physical system proximity or local network access. Attackers can leverage the vulnerable id parameter to construct malicious sql payloads that bypass normal input validation mechanisms and directly manipulate database operations. This remote exploitability significantly increases the attack surface and allows threat actors to target systems from external networks without requiring prior access credentials or system compromise. The vulnerability's presence in the NetSecConfigService.java file suggests that it operates within a network security configuration management context, potentially affecting network security policies, access controls, and system authentication mechanisms. The public disclosure of this exploit further amplifies the risk, as it provides attackers with readily available tools and techniques to target vulnerable installations.
The operational impact of CVE-2024-10135 extends beyond simple data theft to encompass complete system compromise and potential lateral movement within affected networks. Successful exploitation could enable attackers to escalate privileges, modify network security configurations, and establish persistent access points within the target environment. The vulnerability's location within network security services makes it particularly dangerous as it could allow attackers to undermine the very security controls designed to protect the system. Organizations utilizing ESAFENET CDG 5 may face regulatory compliance violations, financial losses, and reputational damage if this vulnerability is exploited. The lack of vendor response to early disclosure attempts creates additional operational challenges, leaving affected organizations without official patches or mitigation guidance during the active exploitation period. This vulnerability aligns with CWE-89 sql injection and follows patterns commonly associated with attack techniques documented in the mitre ATT&CK framework under the credential access and defense evasion domains.
Organizations should implement immediate mitigations including input validation, parameterized queries, and access controls to prevent exploitation of this vulnerability. The recommended approach involves disabling or restricting access to the vulnerable actionDelNetSecConfig endpoint until proper patches are applied. Network segmentation and intrusion detection systems should be deployed to monitor for exploitation attempts and anomalous sql query patterns. Security teams should conduct comprehensive vulnerability assessments across all ESAFENET CDG 5 installations and implement web application firewalls to filter malicious sql injection attempts. Regular security audits and penetration testing should be performed to identify similar vulnerabilities in other system components. The absence of vendor response necessitates proactive security measures and potentially alternative solutions including third-party security patches or system upgrades to address this critical weakness in the network security infrastructure.