CVE-2025-68825 in Hive
Summary
by MITRE • 08/24/2026
HCL Hive is affected by incorrect default permissions which could allow an attacker unauthorized lateral movement, container breakout, and interception of sensitive internal communications.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 08/24/2026
The vulnerability identified in HCL Hive stems from a critical misconfiguration regarding the default file system and network permissions within its deployment environment. This flaw creates a significant security gap that undermines the principle of least privilege, which is fundamental to secure software architecture. By failing to restrict access rights appropriately during initial setup or runtime operations, the application inadvertently exposes sensitive internal components to unauthorized entities. This lack of strict permission controls allows external actors who have gained an initial foothold within the network perimeter to exploit these loose settings for further malicious activities without encountering immediate resistance from operating system-level security mechanisms.
The operational impact of this vulnerability is severe and multifaceted, primarily facilitating lateral movement across the infrastructure. An attacker can leverage the incorrect default permissions to traverse between different nodes or services that are part of the HCL Hive ecosystem. This capability effectively neutralizes network segmentation strategies designed to contain breaches within a specific zone. Once an adversary establishes access on one compromised node, they can move laterally with relative ease, expanding their scope of control and increasing the potential blast radius of the incident. This behavior aligns closely with MITRE ATT&CK technique T1021 Remote Services, where attackers use remote services to move through a network, as well as T1570 Lateral Tool Transfer if files are being moved between systems for further exploitation.
Furthermore, this permission flaw significantly increases the risk of container breakout scenarios. In environments utilizing containerization technologies such as Docker or Kubernetes, which HCL Hive may interact with or deploy within, overly permissive settings can allow a process running inside a container to access host-level resources or escape its isolated environment entirely. This containment failure is particularly dangerous because it grants an attacker direct interaction with the underlying infrastructure, potentially leading to full system compromise rather than just isolation of the affected application instance. Such escapes are often categorized under CWE-250: Execution After Detachment from Privileged Context and can be mapped to MITRE ATT&CK technique T1611 Escape to Host if the container runtime is compromised through these permission errors.
In addition to lateral movement and breakout risks, the vulnerability enables the interception of sensitive internal communications. Because default permissions may not enforce strict encryption or authentication requirements for inter-service traffic within the Hive architecture, an attacker positioned on a neighboring node or within the same network segment can perform man-in-the-middle attacks. This allows for the sniffing of unencrypted data flows, exposing proprietary information, credentials, and other confidential payloads transmitted between services. This aspect relates to CWE-319: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information and MITRE ATT&CK technique T1048: Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol, as it facilitates both the eavesdropping on internal communications and their potential exfiltration using protocols that are not properly secured by default.
To mitigate these risks, immediate remediation efforts should focus on auditing and hardening the permission settings of all HCL Hive components. Administrators must ensure that file system permissions adhere to strict least-privilege principles, restricting read and write access only to necessary processes and users. Network-level mitigations include enforcing mutual TLS for all internal communications to prevent interception and implementing robust network segmentation policies that limit lateral movement capabilities even if a single node is compromised. Additionally, container runtime configurations should be reviewed to ensure that security contexts are properly defined, preventing any possibility of host escape through permission abuse. Regular vulnerability scanning and configuration audits against industry standards such as CIS Benchmarks for Docker or Kubernetes can help identify similar misconfigurations before they are exploited by adversaries seeking to deepen their access within the enterprise network.