CVE-2026-102158 in CloudVision CUEinfo

Summary

by MITRE • 10/06/2026

Improper validation of selected CloudVision CUE application programming interface (API) request parameters may allow an authenticated network user to perform SQL injection against the backend impacting its availability.

Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.

Analysis

by VulDB Data Team • 10/07/2026

The vulnerability identified in Palo Alto Networks CloudVision represents a critical security flaw rooted in improper input validation within the Customer User Experience or CUE API subsystem. This specific weakness allows an attacker who has already obtained valid authentication credentials for the network management platform to inject malicious SQL commands into backend database queries. The core technical failure lies in the application's handling of user-supplied data passed through the API endpoints, where inputs are not sufficiently sanitized or parameterized before being concatenated directly into SQL statements executed by the underlying database engine. This lack of rigorous validation creates a classic injection vector that bypasses standard access controls because the malicious payload is processed as executable code rather than inert data within the context of the backend query logic.

From an operational perspective, this vulnerability poses a severe risk to the availability and integrity of the CloudVision infrastructure. While SQL injection attacks are often associated with unauthorized data exfiltration or modification in many contexts, the specific impact noted here emphasizes availability disruption. An authenticated attacker can craft payloads designed to cause database errors, lock tables, or consume excessive system resources through time-based blind techniques or complex logical conditions that force the backend service into a failure state. This effectively results in a denial of service condition for legitimate users attempting to manage network devices via CloudVision, potentially halting critical monitoring and configuration tasks across the enterprise environment. The ability to disrupt availability undermines the reliability of centralized network management tools which are often essential for maintaining operational continuity in large-scale deployments.

This flaw aligns with Common Weakness Enumeration CWE-89, commonly known as Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command, also referred to broadly under Injection flaws. The exploitation path leverages valid authentication credentials, placing it within the scope of ATT&CK technique T1059, specifically command scripting or database query injection variants depending on the specific payload structure. Because the attack requires prior authentication, it highlights a significant gap in defense-in-depth strategies where session management and input validation are not tightly coupled to prevent abuse even by legitimate users whose accounts may have been compromised through phishing or credential stuffing attacks. The existence of such an endpoint with weak validation suggests that security controls were likely implemented at the perimeter but failed to enforce strict data integrity checks within the application layer itself.

Mitigation strategies must focus on immediate remediation of the codebase and enhanced monitoring protocols. Developers should implement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database interactions involving user-supplied input, ensuring that data is never interpreted as executable SQL syntax regardless of its content. Input validation routines must be strengthened to reject any characters or sequences associated with SQL dialects unless they are explicitly whitelisted for specific use cases such as search filters, and even then, strict type checking should apply. For organizations currently running affected versions, applying the vendor-provided patch is the primary corrective action. In the interim, network segmentation can limit access to CloudVision management interfaces to trusted IP ranges only, reducing the attack surface available to potential adversaries who might have obtained valid credentials through other vectors. Additionally, deploying Web Application Firewalls with rules tuned for SQL injection patterns may provide a layer of detection and blocking, although this should not be relied upon as a sole defense given that authenticated attacks can sometimes bypass signature-based filters if they use obfuscation techniques.

Responsible

Arista

Reservation

09/28/2026

Disclosure

10/06/2026

Moderation

accepted

EPSS

0.00000

KEV

no

Activities

very low

Sources

Want to stay up to date on a daily basis?

Enable the mail alert feature now!