CVE-2026-108179 in WOLF Plugin
Summary
by MITRE • 10/13/2026
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in PluginUs.Net WOLF bulk-editor allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects WOLF: from n/a through 1.1.1.
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/13/2026
The identified security flaw represents a classic instance of improper neutralization of special elements within an SQL command, commonly categorized under the Common Weakness Enumeration as CWE-89. This vulnerability specifically impacts PluginUs.Net WOLF bulk-editor software in versions ranging from n/a through 1.1.1. The core technical issue stems from the application's failure to adequately sanitize or validate user-supplied input before incorporating it into dynamically constructed SQL queries. When an attacker provides maliciously crafted data, the database engine interprets this input as executable code rather than literal string values, thereby breaking out of the intended query context. This specific manifestation is classified as a Blind SQL Injection because the application does not return direct error messages or result sets that reveal the outcome of the injected commands to the user interface. Instead, the attacker must infer information based on indirect indicators such as response times, HTTP status codes, or subtle differences in page content resulting from true and false conditions evaluated by the database backend.
From an operational perspective, this vulnerability poses a severe risk to data integrity and confidentiality within environments utilizing WOLF bulk-editor for managing plugin configurations or related assets. An attacker with network access can exploit this flaw to perform unauthorized actions against the underlying database server. These actions include reading sensitive information such as user credentials, configuration files, or proprietary business logic stored in the database tables. Furthermore, depending on the privileges granted to the database account used by the web application, an attacker may potentially modify existing data, delete critical records, or even execute administrative commands that could compromise the entire server infrastructure. The blind nature of this injection requires a more sophisticated approach from the adversary, often involving time-based or boolean-based techniques where payloads are designed to trigger delays or conditional logic changes that can be observed remotely without direct feedback loops.
This vulnerability aligns with several tactics and techniques defined in the MITRE ATT&CK framework, particularly those related to Collection via Command and Scripting Interpreter for data exfiltration and Defense Evasion through obfuscation of SQL payloads. The lack of input validation also reflects a failure in secure coding practices that are emphasized by industry standards such as OWASP Top 10, specifically under the category of Injection flaws which consistently rank among the most critical web application security risks. To mitigate this vulnerability, developers must implement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database interactions involving user-controlled data. This approach ensures that input is treated strictly as data and never as executable code by the SQL engine. Additionally, implementing strict input validation using allowlists to restrict acceptable characters and lengths can provide an additional layer of defense. Deploying a Web Application Firewall may also help detect and block common injection patterns before they reach the application logic, although this should be viewed as a compensatory control rather than a primary fix for the underlying code defect.