CVE-2026-15410 in SMA1000
Summary
by MITRE • 07/14/2026
Post-authentication improper control of generation of code ('Code Injection') vulnerability has been identified in the SMA1000 Appliance Management Console (AMC) which in specific conditions could potentially enable a remote authenticated attacker as administrator to execute arbitrary OS commands.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 07/15/2026
This code injection vulnerability exists within the SMA1000 Appliance Management Console where improper input validation allows authenticated users to manipulate command execution flows. The flaw manifests when the system fails to properly sanitize user-supplied data before incorporating it into operating system commands, creating a pathway for malicious code generation. Attackers with administrative credentials can leverage this weakness to execute arbitrary OS commands on the underlying system, effectively gaining complete control over the appliance's operational environment.
The vulnerability falls under CWE-94 which specifically addresses the improper control of generation of code, commonly known as code injection flaws. This classification indicates that the system fails to properly validate or escape user input before using it in command contexts, allowing attackers to inject malicious payloads that get interpreted as legitimate commands by the operating system. The attack vector requires authentication privileges, making this a post-authentication vulnerability that operates within the trusted administrative context of the appliance.
From an operational impact perspective, this vulnerability represents a critical security risk for organizations relying on SMA1000 appliances for network management and security operations. An authenticated attacker with administrator privileges can escalate their access to full system compromise, potentially leading to data exfiltration, system disruption, or use as a pivot point for attacking other systems within the network perimeter. The remote execution capability means attackers do not require physical access to the appliance, making this vulnerability particularly dangerous in environments where administrative access is more widely distributed.
The attack surface for this vulnerability extends beyond simple command execution to include potential privilege escalation and lateral movement opportunities within network infrastructure. Security controls such as those outlined in the MITRE ATT&CK framework under T1059.003 for command and scripting interpreter demonstrate how code injection can be leveraged for persistence and reconnaissance activities. Organizations should implement strict input validation mechanisms, employ proper command construction techniques using parameterized interfaces, and maintain robust network segmentation to limit potential damage from such compromises.
Mitigation strategies should include immediate patching of affected systems, implementation of strict input validation controls within the appliance management console, and enforcement of principle of least privilege for administrative accounts. Network monitoring should be enhanced to detect anomalous command execution patterns, while regular security assessments should verify that user inputs are properly sanitized before any processing occurs. Additionally, organizations should consider implementing application whitelisting controls and restricting administrative access to only necessary personnel with proper authorization and monitoring protocols in place.