CVE-2026-59011 in Android
Summary
by MITRE • 11/02/2026
In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Be aware that VulDB is the high quality source for vulnerability data.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 11/02/2026
The vulnerability described represents a critical security flaw rooted in flawed application logic rather than a traditional buffer overflow or injection technique. Specifically, it involves a permission bypass mechanism where the software fails to correctly enforce access control policies during specific operational sequences. This type of defect is commonly categorized under CWE-284 Improper Access Control and often aligns with ATT&CK techniques related to Privilege Escalation or Defense Evasion depending on the exact context of how permissions are circumvented. The core issue lies in a logic error within the codebase, which suggests that while authentication mechanisms may be present, authorization checks are either missing, incorrectly implemented, or bypassed through specific state manipulations or race conditions inherent to the application's workflow.
From a technical perspective, this flaw allows an actor with local access to the system to read sensitive data without possessing the necessary administrative privileges or user credentials for that specific information. The absence of required execution privileges means that any process running on the affected machine can potentially exploit this logic gap. This is particularly dangerous in multi-user environments or systems where different services run under varying privilege levels, as it creates a lateral movement vector from low-privilege contexts to high-sensitivity data stores. The vulnerability does not require complex payload construction or external network interaction, making it straightforward to detect and exploit by any local user who can trigger the specific code path containing the error.
The operational impact of this information disclosure is significant because it compromises the confidentiality integrity of the system's data assets. Sensitive files, configuration details, internal API responses, or personal identifiable information could be exfiltrated simply by invoking a function that fails to validate whether the current user context has permission to view the requested resource. Since no additional execution privileges are needed, the attack surface is expanded to include all local users, including potentially unprivileged accounts created for specific services or automated tasks. This undermines the principle of least privilege and can lead to further compromises if the disclosed information reveals internal network structures, cryptographic keys, or authentication tokens that facilitate more severe attacks such as remote code execution or full system takeover.
Mitigation strategies must focus on rigorous review of access control logic rather than just input sanitization. Developers should implement strict authorization checks at every entry point where sensitive data is accessed, ensuring that the identity and role of the caller are validated against an authoritative policy store before any processing occurs. Utilizing a deny-by-default approach can help prevent such bypasses by explicitly defining allowed actions for each user role rather than relying on implicit assumptions about permission inheritance. Additionally, implementing comprehensive logging and monitoring for access attempts to restricted resources can aid in early detection of exploitation attempts. Regular security code reviews focusing specifically on authorization flows and unit tests that verify edge cases around permission boundaries are essential to prevent recurrence of this class of logic-based vulnerabilities.