Oracle Trace File Analyzer up to 12.1.2.8 TFA Collector cryptographic issue

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
6.0$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in Oracle Trace File Analyzer up to 12.1.2.8. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the component TFA Collector. Performing a manipulation results in cryptographic issue. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2004-2761. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. Furthermore, an exploit is available. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Oracle Trace File Analyzer up to 12.1.2.8. This affects an unknown code block of the component TFA Collector. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cryptographic issue vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-310. This is going to have an impact on integrity. The summary by CVE is:

The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm is not collision resistant, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to conduct spoofing attacks, as demonstrated by attacks on the use of MD5 in the signature algorithm of an X.509 certificate.

The bug was discovered 12/30/2008. The weakness was published 04/19/2017 by Alex as Oracle Critical Patch Update Advisory - April 2017 as confirmed advisory (Website). The advisory is shared at oracle.com. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2004-2761 since 01/05/2009. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The requirement for exploitation is a authentication. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available. MITRE ATT&CK project uses the attack technique T1600 for this issue.

The exploit is shared for download at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 35595 (Fedora 9 : nss-3.12.2.0-2.fc9 (2009-1276)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Fedora Local Security Checks and running in the context l. The commercial vulnerability scanner Qualys is able to test this issue with plugin 42012 (X.509 Certificate MD5 Signature Collision Vulnerability).

Upgrading eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published immediately after the disclosure of the vulnerability.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at Exploit-DB (24807), Tenable (35595), SecurityFocus (BID 33065†), OSVDB (45127†) and Secunia (SA33826†). Similar entries are available at VDB-45768, VDB-55496, VDB-55495 and VDB-100050. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Productinfo

Vendor

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.1
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.0

VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 3.9
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

Vendor Base Score (Oracle): 4.3
Vendor Vector (Oracle): 🔍

ADP CISA Base Score: 9.8
ADP CISA Vector: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Cryptographic issue
CWE: CWE-310
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Nessus ID: 35595
Nessus Name: Fedora 9 : nss-3.12.2.0-2.fc9 (2009-1276)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Context: 🔍

OpenVAS ID: 103275
OpenVAS Name: HPE Network Products Multiple Remote Vulnerabilities
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍

Qualys ID: 🔍
Qualys Name: 🔍

Exploit-DB: 🔍

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Upgrade
Status: 🔍

Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

03/04/2007 🔍
12/30/2008 +666 days 🔍
12/30/2008 +0 days 🔍
01/05/2009 +6 days 🔍
01/05/2009 +0 days 🔍
02/05/2009 +31 days 🔍
11/08/2010 +641 days 🔍
04/19/2017 +2354 days 🔍
04/19/2017 +0 days 🔍
04/19/2017 +0 days 🔍
05/28/2026 +3326 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: oracle.com

Advisory: Oracle Critical Patch Update Advisory - April 2017
Researcher: Alexander Sotirov, Marc Stevens, Jacob Appelbaum, Arjen Lenstra, David Molnar, Dag Arne Osvik, Benne de Weger. (Alex)
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2004-2761 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2004-2761
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-100245

OVAL: 🔍

CERT: 🔍
SecurityFocus: 33065 - IETF RFC 3279 X.509 Certificate MD5 Signature Collision Vulnerability
Secunia: 33826
OSVDB: 45127 - MD5 Algorithm Hash Function Collision Weakness
SecurityTracker: 1024697

scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 04/19/2017 19:11
Updated: 05/28/2026 21:41
Changes: 04/19/2017 19:11 (88), 09/15/2020 09:14 (1), 12/20/2020 22:14 (2), 01/12/2025 03:41 (22), 01/19/2025 05:02 (1), 05/28/2026 21:41 (12)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Are you interested in using VulDB?

Download the whitepaper to learn more about our service!