Netwin DMail/SurgeFTP NWAuth 2.0/3.0 -del/-lookup memory corruption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 10.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Netwin DMail and SurgeFTP. It has been rated as critical. The affected element is an unknown function of the component NWAuth 2.0/3.0. The manipulation of the argument -del/-lookup leads to memory corruption. This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2001-1355. No exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Netwin DMail and SurgeFTP (version unknown). It has been rated as very critical. This issue affects an unknown function of the component NWAuth 2.0/3.0. The manipulation of the argument -del/-lookup with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Buffer overflows in NetWin Authentication Module (NWAuth) 3.0b and earlier, as implemented in DMail, SurgeFTP, and possibly other packages, could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code via long arguments to (1) the -del command or (2) the -lookup command.
The weakness was published 07/20/2001 by ByteRage (Website). The advisory is shared at online.securityfocus.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2001-1355. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is needed for a successful exploitation. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 04/08/2019).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (6865) and SecurityFocus (BID 3077†). Similar entry is available at VDB-17044. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Vendor
Name
License
Website
- Vendor: http://netwininfosolutions.com/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 10.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 10.0
VulDB Base Score: 10.0
VulDB Temp Score: 10.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
07/20/2001 🔍07/20/2001 🔍
07/20/2001 🔍
07/07/2014 🔍
04/08/2019 🔍
Sources
Vendor: netwininfosolutions.comAdvisory: online.securityfocus.com⛔
Researcher: ByteRage
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2001-1355 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2001-1355
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-17045
X-Force: 6865 - NetWin NWAuth buffer overflows could allow arbitrary code execution
SecurityFocus: 3077 - Netwin NWAuth Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 07/07/2014 15:23Updated: 04/08/2019 15:33
Changes: 07/07/2014 15:23 (53), 04/08/2019 15:33 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.