| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3.9 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Lycos Htmlgear Guestgear and classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part. This manipulation causes cross site scripting. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2002-1493. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. Furthermore, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Lycos Htmlgear Guestgear (the affected version unknown). It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-80. The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as "<", ">", and "&" that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Lycos HTMLGear guestbook allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary script via (1) STYLE attributes or (2) SRC attributes in an IMG tag.
The weakness was published 04/02/2003 by Matthew Murphy (mattmurphy) (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at archives.neohapsis.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2002-1493. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Technical details are unknown but a public exploit is available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
It is possible to download the exploit at exploit-db.com. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (12235), Exploit-DB (21802) and SecurityFocus (BID 5728†). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-80 / CWE-74 / CWE-707
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Download: 🔍
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Exploit-DB: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/17/2002 🔍04/02/2003 🔍
04/02/2003 🔍
08/08/2014 🔍
08/19/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: archives.neohapsis.comResearcher: Matthew Murphy (mattmurphy)
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2002-1493 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2002-1493
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-20275
X-Force: 12235 - Lycos GuestGear IMG tag cross-site scripting
SecurityFocus: 5728 - Lycos HTMLGear guestGear CSS HTML Injection Vulnerability
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 08/08/2014 12:23Updated: 08/19/2024 03:26
Changes: 08/08/2014 12:23 (51), 05/03/2019 15:43 (1), 08/19/2024 03:26 (25)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.