Pingtel Xpressa up to 2.1.11.24 HTTP GET application.cgi memory corruption
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Pingtel Xpressa up to 2.1.11.24. It has been rated as critical. This affects an unknown part of the file application.cgi of the component HTTP GET Handler. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2004-1680. There is not any exploit available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Pingtel Xpressa up to 2.1.11.24. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects an unknown function of the file application.cgi of the component HTTP GET Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. Using CWE to declare the problem leads to CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. Impacted is confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
application.cgi in the Pingtel Xpressa handset running firmware 2.1.11.24 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (VxWorks OS crash) via a long HTTP GET request, possibly triggering a buffer overflow.
The weakness was released 09/13/2004 with @stake, Inc. (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at atstake.com. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2004-1680 since 02/21/2005. The exploitation is known to be easy. The attack may be initiated remotely. The successful exploitation requires a simple authentication. Technical details of the vulnerability are known, but there is no available exploit.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (17346), SecurityFocus (BID 11161†) and Secunia (SA12523†). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 6.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Base Score: 6.3
VulDB Temp Score: 6.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
09/13/2004 🔍09/13/2004 🔍
09/13/2004 🔍
09/15/2004 🔍
02/21/2005 🔍
04/14/2015 🔍
06/21/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: atstake.comOrganization: @stake, Inc.
Status: Not defined
CVE: CVE-2004-1680 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2004-1680
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-22211
X-Force: 17346 - Pingtel xpressa application.cgi denial of service
SecurityFocus: 11161 - Pingtel Xpressa Handset Remote Denial Of Service Vulnerability
Secunia: 12523 - Pingtel Xpressa HTTP Management Interface Denial of Service, Less Critical
Entry
Created: 04/14/2015 13:19Updated: 06/21/2018 09:07
Changes: 04/14/2015 13:19 (52), 06/21/2018 09:07 (7)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:88B:103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.