hp Linux Imaging And Printing Project 3.10.9 hpmud_get_pml memory corruption

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
7.3$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability was found in hp Linux Imaging And Printing Project 3.10.9 and classified as critical. The affected element is the function hpmud_get_pml of the component Printing. The manipulation results in memory corruption. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2010-4267. No exploit exists.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in hp Linux Imaging And Printing Project 3.10.9 (Printing Software). Affected is the function hpmud_get_pml of the component Printing. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. CVE summarizes:

Stack-based buffer overflow in the hpmud_get_pml function in io/hpmud/pml.c in Hewlett-Packard Linux Imaging and Printing (HPLIP) 1.6.7, 3.9.8, 3.10.9, and probably other versions allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted SNMP response with a large length value.

The weakness was disclosed 01/17/2011 by Sebastian Krahmer as Bug 662740 as not defined bug report (Bugzilla). The advisory is shared for download at bugzilla.redhat.com. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2010-4267. The exploitability is told to be easy. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploitation doesn't require any form of authentication. There are known technical details, but no exploit is available. The current price for an exploit might be approx. USD $0-$5k (estimation calculated on 11/30/2024).

The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 75525 (openSUSE Security Update : hplip (openSUSE-SU-2011:0068-1)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family SuSE Local Security Checks. The commercial vulnerability scanner Qualys is able to test this issue with plugin 165187 (SUSE Security Update for Multiple Packages (SUSE-SR:2011:005)).

A possible mitigation has been published immediately after the disclosure of the vulnerability.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (64738), Tenable (75525), SecurityFocus (BID 45833†), OSVDB (70498†) and SecurityTracker (ID 1024967†). The entries VDB-55634, VDB-55633, VDB-55627 and VDB-56204 are pretty similar. Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.

Productinfo

Type

Vendor

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.3

VulDB Base Score: 7.3
VulDB Temp Score: 7.3
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Memory corruption
CWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Nessus ID: 75525
Nessus Name: openSUSE Security Update : hplip (openSUSE-SU-2011:0068-1)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Port: 🔍

OpenVAS ID: 68990
OpenVAS Name: Debian Security Advisory DSA 2152-1 (hplip)
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍

Qualys ID: 🔍
Qualys Name: 🔍

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: no mitigation known
Status: 🔍

Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍

Timelineinfo

11/16/2010 🔍
01/17/2011 +62 days 🔍
01/17/2011 +0 days 🔍
01/17/2011 +0 days 🔍
01/17/2011 +0 days 🔍
01/18/2011 +1 days 🔍
01/20/2011 +1 days 🔍
01/24/2011 +4 days 🔍
06/13/2014 +1236 days 🔍
03/19/2015 +279 days 🔍
11/30/2024 +3544 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: hp.com

Advisory: Bug 662740
Researcher: Sebastian Krahmer
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍

CVE: CVE-2010-4267 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2010-4267
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-56172

OVAL: 🔍

X-Force: 64738
SecurityFocus: 45833 - HP Linux Imaging and Printing System SNMP Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Secunia: 42939
OSVDB: 70498 - HP Linux Imaging and Printing (HPLIP) hpmud_get_pml() Function SNMP Response Remote Overflow
SecurityTracker: 1024967
Vulnerability Center: 29336 - HP linux Imaging and Printing System (HPLIP) Remote DoS or Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability, High

See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 03/19/2015 23:27
Updated: 11/30/2024 21:06
Changes: 03/19/2015 23:27 (69), 03/14/2017 11:43 (10), 10/13/2021 01:24 (5), 10/13/2021 01:32 (1), 11/30/2024 21:06 (15)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216:DC1:103

Once again VulDB remains the best source for vulnerability data.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Might our Artificial Intelligence support you?

Check our Alexa App!