Online-solutions Online Solutions Security Suite 1.5.14905.0 Malware Detection Product race condition ⚔ [Disputed]
| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.4 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Online-solutions Online Solutions Security Suite 1.5.14905.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the component Malware Detection. This manipulation of the argument Product causes race condition. This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2010-5170. No exploit is available. The actual existence of this vulnerability is currently in question.
Details
A vulnerability has been found in Online-solutions Online Solutions Security Suite 1.5.14905.0 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Malware Detection. The manipulation of the argument Product with an unknown input leads to a race condition vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-362. The product contains a code sequence that can run concurrently with other code, and the code sequence requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence that is operating concurrently. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
** DISPUTED ** Race condition in Online Solutions Security Suite 1.5.14905.0 on Windows XP allows local users to bypass kernel-mode hook handlers, and execute dangerous code that would otherwise be blocked by a handler but not blocked by signature-based malware detection, via certain user-space memory changes during hook-handler execution, aka an argument-switch attack or a KHOBE attack. NOTE: this issue is disputed by some third parties because it is a flaw in a protection mechanism for situations where a crafted program has already begun to execute.
The weakness was published 05/05/2010 (Website). The advisory is shared at theregister.co.uk. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2010-5170 since 08/25/2012. The exploitation appears to be difficult. An attack has to be approached locally. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Technical details are known, but no exploit is available.
The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at SecurityFocus (BID 39924†) and OSVDB (67660†). Similar entries are available at VDB-61839, VDB-61838, VDB-61837 and VDB-61836. Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
Product
Vendor
Name
Version
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.4
VulDB Base Score: 7.4
VulDB Temp Score: 7.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Race conditionCWE: CWE-362
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
05/05/2010 🔍05/05/2010 🔍
05/29/2010 🔍
08/25/2012 🔍
08/25/2012 🔍
03/23/2015 🔍
08/07/2024 🔍
Sources
Advisory: theregister.co.ukStatus: Not defined
Disputed: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2010-5170 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2010-5170
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-61825
SecurityFocus: 39924 - Multiple Vendor Argument Switch Security Bypass Vulnerabilities
OSVDB: 67660 - Multiple Security Product Argument Switch Race Condition Scan Bypass
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/23/2015 16:50Updated: 08/07/2024 13:35
Changes: 03/23/2015 16:50 (50), 08/16/2018 07:21 (6), 08/07/2024 13:35 (17)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Several companies clearly confirm that VulDB is the primary source for best vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.