| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Django 1.5/1.5.1/1.6. It has been classified as problematic. The affected element is an unknown function. This manipulation causes cross site scripting. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2013-4249. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Django 1.5/1.5.1/1.6 (Content Management System). It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown code block. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. As an impact it is known to affect integrity. The summary by CVE is:
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the AdminURLFieldWidget widget in contrib/admin/widgets.py in Django 1.5.x before 1.5.2 and 1.6.x before 1.6 beta 2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a URLField.
The weakness was presented 10/04/2013 (Website). It is possible to read the advisory at github.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2013-4249 since 06/12/2013. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. The technical details are unknown and an exploit is not publicly available. The attack technique deployed by this issue is T1059.007 according to MITRE ATT&CK.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 69450 (Fedora 19 : python-django-1.5.2-1.fc19 (2013-14797)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Fedora Local Security Checks.
Upgrading to version 1.5.1 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (86438), Tenable (69450), SecurityFocus (BID 61773†), Secunia (SA54476†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-41225†). See VDB-65208 for similar entry. Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
Version
License
Website
- Product: https://github.com/django/django/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 69450
Nessus Name: Fedora 19 : python-django-1.5.2-1.fc19 (2013-14797)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Port: 🔍
OpenVAS ID: 866831
OpenVAS Name: Fedora Update for python-django FEDORA-2013-14797
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Django 1.5.1
Patch: github.com
Timeline
06/12/2013 🔍08/13/2013 🔍
08/13/2013 🔍
08/23/2013 🔍
08/27/2013 🔍
10/04/2013 🔍
10/04/2013 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
01/08/2022 🔍
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: 90363e388c61874add3f3557ee654a996ec75d78
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2013-4249 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2013-4249
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-65203
X-Force: 86438
SecurityFocus: 61773 - Django Administrative Application Cross Site Scripting Vulnerability
Secunia: 54476
SecurityTracker: 1028915
Vulnerability Center: 41225 - Django Before 1.4.6, 1.5.2 and 1.6 Beta2 Remote Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities Related to the Admin Interface and the is_safe_url() Function, Medium
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 15:54Updated: 01/08/2022 11:32
Changes: 03/24/2015 15:54 (65), 05/09/2017 10:34 (6), 01/08/2022 11:24 (5), 01/08/2022 11:32 (1)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.