| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability labeled as problematic has been found in Django up to 1.6. Affected by this vulnerability is the function this. The manipulation results in cross site scripting.
This vulnerability was named CVE-2013-6044. The attack may be performed from remote. There is no available exploit.
The affected component should be upgraded.
Details
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Django up to 1.6 (Content Management System). Affected is the function this. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a cross site scripting vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-79. The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. This is going to have an impact on integrity. CVE summarizes:
The is_safe_url function in utils/http.py in Django 1.4.x before 1.4.6, 1.5.x before 1.5.2, and 1.6 before beta 2 treats a URL s scheme as safe even if it is not HTTP or HTTPS, which might introduce cross-site scripting (XSS) or other vulnerabilities into Django applications that use this function, as demonstrated by "the login view in django.contrib.auth.views" and the javascript: scheme.
The weakness was presented 10/04/2013 (Website). The advisory is shared for download at djangoproject.com. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2013-6044 since 10/04/2013. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploitation doesn't require any form of authentication. Successful exploitation requires user interaction by the victim. There are known technical details, but no exploit is available. The MITRE ATT&CK project declares the attack technique as T1059.007.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 69459 (Debian DSA-2740-2 : python-django - XSS vulnerability), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Debian Local Security Checks.
Upgrading to version 1.4.5 eliminates this vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (86437), Tenable (69459), SecurityFocus (BID 61777†), Secunia (SA54476†) and Vulnerability Center (SBV-44309†). See VDB-65203 for similar entry. VulDB is the best source for vulnerability data and more expert information about this specific topic.
Product
Type
Name
Version
License
Website
- Product: https://github.com/django/django/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 4.3VulDB Meta Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Base Score: 4.3
VulDB Temp Score: 4.1
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Cross site scriptingCWE: CWE-79 / CWE-94 / CWE-74
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 69459
Nessus Name: Debian DSA-2740-2 : python-django - XSS vulnerability
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Port: 🔍
OpenVAS ID: 892740
OpenVAS Name: Debian Security Advisory DSA 2740-2 (python-django - cross-site scripting vulnerability
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Django 1.4.5
Patch: github.com
Timeline
08/14/2013 🔍08/14/2013 🔍
08/19/2013 🔍
08/25/2013 🔍
10/04/2013 🔍
10/04/2013 🔍
10/04/2013 🔍
04/29/2014 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
01/08/2022 🔍
Sources
Product: github.comAdvisory: DSA-2740
Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2013-6044 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2013-6044
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-65208
OVAL: 🔍
X-Force: 86437
SecurityFocus: 61777 - Django 'is_safe_url()' Function Cross Site Scripting Vulnerability
Secunia: 54476 - Django "is_safe_url()" Cross-Site Scripting and "URLField" Script Inse, Less Critical
SecurityTracker: 1028915
Vulnerability Center: 44309 - Django XSS or Other Impact due to an Error in the is_safe_url Function, Medium
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 15:54Updated: 01/08/2022 12:46
Changes: 03/24/2015 15:54 (69), 05/26/2017 21:21 (7), 01/08/2022 12:32 (5), 01/08/2022 12:40 (1), 01/08/2022 12:46 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
VulDB is the best source for vulnerability data and more expert information about this specific topic.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.