| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 10.0 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in Fujitsu Interstage Application Server 9.0.0. This issue affects some unknown processing. This manipulation causes memory corruption. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2013-7105. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit.
Details
A vulnerability classified as very critical was found in Fujitsu Interstage Application Server 9.0.0 (Application Server Software). Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
Buffer overflow in the Interstage HTTP Server log functionality, as used in Fujitsu Interstage Application Server 9.0.0, 9.1.0, 9.2.0, 9.3.1, and 10.0.0; and Interstage Studio 9.0.0, 9.1.0, 9.2.0, and 10.0.0, has unspecified impact and attack vectors related to "ihsrlog/rotatelogs."
The weakness was presented 12/14/2013 (Website). The advisory is shared at securitytracker.com. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2013-7105 since 12/14/2013. The exploitation appears to be easy. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available. The price for an exploit might be around USD $0-$5k at the moment (estimation calculated on 01/12/2022).
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at SecurityFocus (BID 63929†). If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 10.0VulDB Meta Temp Score: 10.0
VulDB Base Score: 10.0
VulDB Temp Score: 10.0
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Not defined
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Timeline
11/26/2013 🔍12/14/2013 🔍
12/14/2013 🔍
12/14/2013 🔍
03/24/2015 🔍
01/12/2022 🔍
Sources
Advisory: securitytracker.com⛔Status: Not defined
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2013-7105 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2013-7105
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-65773
SecurityFocus: 63929 - Multiple Fujitsu Interstage Products HTTP Server Unspecified Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
SecurityTracker: 1029398
Entry
Created: 03/24/2015 15:54Updated: 01/12/2022 01:28
Changes: 03/24/2015 15:54 (51), 01/12/2022 01:28 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.