CVE-2026-106368 in Chrome
Summary
by MITRE • 10/07/2026
UI misrepresentation in UI in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 155.0.8059.39 allowed a remote attacker to spoof UI elements via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/07/2026
The vulnerability identified as a user interface misrepresentation flaw within the Chromium engine, specifically affecting Google Chrome on Android prior to version 155.0.8059.39, represents a significant risk related to social engineering and identity spoofing. This issue stems from an improper handling of rendering logic that allows malicious actors to manipulate how web content is displayed to the end user. By crafting specific HTML pages containing carefully constructed elements, an attacker can deceive users into perceiving false information or mimicking legitimate interfaces. The severity is classified as low by Chromium security standards because it does not directly compromise system integrity or allow arbitrary code execution; however, its potential for facilitating further attacks makes it a critical concern in the context of user trust and secure browsing practices.
From a technical perspective, this flaw involves discrepancies between the actual state of the web page and what is visually presented to the user on the device screen. Attackers can exploit rendering inconsistencies or layout bugs to overlay deceptive elements over legitimate content or alter visual cues such as domain names, security indicators, or form fields. This capability enables the creation of phishing pages that appear authentic at a glance but are designed to harvest sensitive credentials or personal data. The attack vector is remote and requires user interaction, typically involving the victim visiting a malicious website hosted by the attacker. Once on the page, the crafted HTML triggers the rendering anomaly, resulting in a spoofed interface that misleads the user about the true nature of the site they are interacting with.
The operational impact of this vulnerability lies primarily in its facilitation of phishing campaigns and credential theft. Users who encounter these spoofed interfaces may inadvertently submit login credentials, financial information, or other sensitive data to malicious actors under the false assumption that they are communicating with a trusted entity such as a bank, social media platform, or government service. This undermines the fundamental security principle of user awareness and trust in digital interactions. While the vulnerability itself does not lead to direct system compromise, it serves as an entry point for more severe attacks by lowering the barrier for successful social engineering efforts. The effectiveness of this attack relies heavily on the victim's inability to distinguish between legitimate and spoofed UI elements due to the flaw in Chrome’s rendering engine.
Mitigation strategies focus primarily on updating the browser software to a version where these rendering anomalies have been addressed. Users running Google Chrome on Android prior to 155.0.8059.39 are strongly advised to update immediately to ensure that patches for this UI misrepresentation issue are applied. In addition to software updates, security awareness training remains crucial in helping users recognize signs of phishing attempts, such as subtle discrepancies in domain names or unexpected requests for sensitive information. Organizations should also consider implementing content security policies and other browser-based protections that can help detect and block known malicious domains before they fully render deceptive interfaces.
This vulnerability aligns with Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) category CWE-1029, which describes misleading output to the user, often resulting from improper validation or rendering logic. It also maps to MITRE ATT&CK technique T1586.002, specifically Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment, although in this case, the spearphishing is delivered via a crafted web page rather than an attachment. The attack falls under the broader category of social engineering attacks where trust is manipulated through visual deception. Understanding these mappings helps security professionals categorize and prioritize remediation efforts based on established industry frameworks for threat modeling and vulnerability management.