CVE-2026-108806 in EmployeeRecruitmentSystem
Summary
by MITRE • 10/12/2026
A vulnerability has been found in krupalshah EmployeeRecruitmentSystem up to 922ff6d208278282e7c8e36d70d9ae356adec9fe. Affected by this issue is the function mysql_query of the file source/authprocessing.php of the component Forgot Password Handler. Such manipulation of the argument fpemail leads to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/12/2026
The EmployeeRecruitmentSystem, specifically versions up to commit 922ff6d208278282e7c8e36d70d9ae356adec9fe, contains a critical security flaw within its Forgot Password Handler functionality. This vulnerability resides in the source/authprocessing.php file and is triggered by improper input validation when handling user-supplied data for password recovery requests. The core technical issue involves the direct use of unsanitized user input as part of an SQL query executed via the mysql_query function. When a victim initiates a forgot password action, their provided email address is passed directly into the database layer without adequate filtering or parameterization. This architectural oversight allows an attacker to inject malicious SQL code into the fpemail argument, effectively manipulating the backend database queries intended for legitimate authentication processes.
This flaw constitutes a classic example of SQL Injection, categorized under CWE-89 in the Common Weakness Enumeration standards. The vulnerability enables remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands against the application's underlying database. By crafting specific payloads within the email field, an attacker can bypass access controls, extract sensitive data such as user credentials and personal information stored in the recruitment system, modify or delete records, and potentially gain administrative privileges depending on the database server's permissions. The impact is severe because it compromises the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the entire application ecosystem that relies on this database for storing employee and applicant data.
The operational risk associated with this vulnerability is heightened by several factors inherent to the software's lifecycle and distribution model. First, the exploit has been publicly disclosed, meaning that automated scanning tools and malicious actors can readily identify and target vulnerable instances without needing custom development efforts. Second, the product lacks a formal versioning scheme, making it difficult for administrators to determine precisely which deployments are affected or if patches have been applied through unofficial means. This ambiguity complicates vulnerability management and patch deployment strategies significantly. Furthermore, the maintainer has not responded to security disclosures, indicating that no official fix is forthcoming from the original developer community.
Given that this product is no longer supported by its maintainer, traditional mitigation strategies such as applying vendor-provided patches are unavailable. Organizations relying on this system must implement compensating controls immediately to reduce exposure. The most effective technical countermeasure involves implementing a Web Application Firewall (WAF) with rules specifically tuned to detect and block SQL injection patterns in HTTP requests targeting the authprocessing.php endpoint. Additionally, network-level segmentation should be employed to restrict access to the application from untrusted networks until it can be decommissioned or replaced. Input validation at the application layer is also critical; however, since source code modification may not be feasible for unsupported legacy systems, reliance on external security controls becomes paramount.
From a threat intelligence perspective, this vulnerability aligns with MITRE ATT&CK techniques related to SQL Injection (T1190) and potentially Data Exfiltration over Alternative Protocol if the attacker leverages out-of-band data channels through blind injection techniques. The lack of vendor support means that incident response plans must account for potential compromise without relying on vendor assistance for forensic analysis or remediation guidance. Security teams should prioritize inventorying all instances of this software, assessing their exposure to the internet, and planning for migration to a supported alternative recruitment platform as soon as resources allow. Until then, continuous monitoring of database logs for anomalous query patterns is recommended to detect active exploitation attempts in real time.