CVE-2026-7778 in runZero
Summary
by MITRE • 05/05/2026
An issue that could allow a dashboard configuration to be viewed from outside of the authorized organization scope has been resolved. This is an instance of CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management, and has an estimated CVSS score of CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N (5.0, Medium). This issue was fixed in version v4.0.260416.0 of the runZero Platform.
If you want to get best quality of vulnerability data, you may have to visit VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 07/15/2026
This vulnerability represents a critical misconfiguration in privilege management that allowed unauthorized external access to dashboard configurations within the runZero Platform. The issue stems from inadequate access controls that failed to properly enforce organizational boundaries, enabling attackers to view sensitive dashboard information beyond their authorized scope. This type of flaw directly maps to CWE-269 which specifically addresses improper privilege management where system components fail to adequately control access to resources based on user privileges or organizational affiliations. The vulnerability exists at the authentication and authorization layer where the platform should have enforced strict organizational segmentation but instead allowed cross-organizational data exposure.
The technical implementation flaw manifests as a failure in the access control mechanisms that should have validated whether incoming requests originated from authorized organizational domains or users. When dashboard configuration data was requested, the system did not properly verify the requester's organizational context against the data's access restrictions. This creates an information disclosure scenario where external parties could potentially access internal dashboard configurations that contain sensitive operational data, including network mappings, asset inventories, and security assessment results. The CVSS score of 5.0 indicates a medium severity vulnerability with network accessibility, low attack complexity, and limited privileges required for exploitation.
The operational impact of this vulnerability extends beyond simple information disclosure to potentially enable more sophisticated attacks. An attacker who gains access to dashboard configurations could leverage the exposed information to understand the target organization's network topology, identify critical assets, and plan targeted attacks against specific systems or services. The configuration data might reveal sensitive details about security scanning methodologies, asset discovery patterns, and network segmentation strategies that would otherwise remain hidden from external parties. This exposure creates opportunities for reconnaissance activities and could facilitate subsequent exploitation attempts against identified targets within the organization's infrastructure.
Organizations should implement immediate mitigations including verifying that all dashboard access controls are properly configured to enforce organizational boundaries and ensuring that privilege management systems correctly validate user credentials against appropriate authorization scopes. The fix implemented in version v4.0.260416.0 addresses this issue by strengthening the access control validation process for dashboard configurations, ensuring that only authorized users within the correct organizational context can view sensitive information. Security teams should also conduct comprehensive audits of all platform components to identify potential similar privilege management issues and implement proper monitoring to detect unauthorized access attempts. This vulnerability highlights the importance of adhering to the principle of least privilege and maintaining strict segregation between different organizational domains within security platforms.
The remediation approach aligns with ATT&CK framework techniques related to privilege escalation and credential access where attackers might attempt to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data through misconfigured access controls. Organizations should also consider implementing additional logging and monitoring around dashboard access patterns to detect anomalous behavior that might indicate attempted exploitation of similar privilege management flaws. The vulnerability demonstrates how seemingly minor access control oversights can create significant security risks, emphasizing the need for regular security assessments and adherence to secure coding practices that properly implement authorization checks at all levels of system architecture.