CVE-2026-80381 in Guardium Data Protectioninfo

Summary

by MITRE • 10/09/2026

IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute unauthorized SQL statements due to SQL injection.

If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

Analysis

by VulDB Data Team • 10/09/2026

The vulnerability in IBM Guardium Data Protection versions 12.0 through 12.2 represents a critical security flaw rooted in improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command, commonly known as SQL Injection. This class of weakness allows an unauthenticated or remote attacker to interfere with the queries that an application makes to its database. By exploiting this flaw, an adversary can bypass authentication mechanisms and access sensitive data stored within the protected environment. The core technical issue lies in the insufficient validation or sanitization of user-supplied input before it is incorporated into dynamic SQL statements. When the software processes these inputs without adequate checks for malicious syntax, such as single quotes, semicolons, or comment sequences, it inadvertently executes commands intended by the attacker rather than treating them as literal data values.

From an operational perspective, this vulnerability poses a severe risk to the integrity and confidentiality of the protected databases. IBM Guardium is designed to monitor, detect, and prevent unauthorized access to critical data assets; therefore, compromising its own management interface or API undermines the very security posture it aims to enforce. An attacker leveraging this SQL injection could potentially read, modify, or delete arbitrary records from the underlying database. This capability extends beyond simple data exfiltration, as sophisticated attackers may use stacked queries to execute operating system commands if the database backend permits such operations and has appropriate privileges configured. The impact is compounded by the fact that Guardium often holds administrative access to the databases it monitors, meaning a successful exploitation could lead to widespread compromise of multiple protected systems rather than just the application itself.

This vulnerability aligns with CWE-89, which defines Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command, and is frequently associated with ATT&CK technique T1190, Exploit Public-Facing Application. The attack vector typically involves sending crafted HTTP requests to exposed endpoints or API interfaces where input parameters are directly concatenated into SQL queries without parameterized statements or stored procedures. In many enterprise environments, these services may be accessible from untrusted networks if not properly segmented behind firewalls or access control lists, increasing the likelihood of exploitation by external threat actors. The lack of robust input validation serves as a fundamental failure in secure coding practices, highlighting the necessity for rigorous code review and static analysis during software development lifecycles to prevent such injection points.

Mitigation strategies must focus on both immediate remediation and long-term architectural improvements. IBM has released patches that address this specific vulnerability by implementing stricter input filtering and enforcing parameterized queries within the application logic. Organizations running versions 12.0, 12.1, or 12.2 should prioritize applying these updates to all affected instances immediately. In addition to patching, it is advisable to implement Web Application Firewalls that can detect and block common SQL injection patterns in incoming traffic as a compensating control. Furthermore, adhering to the principle of least privilege ensures that even if an injection occurs, the database user account used by Guardium does not possess excessive permissions such as xp_cmdshell or administrative rights on the operating system. Regular security assessments, including dynamic application security testing and penetration testing focused on input validation, are essential to identify similar weaknesses in other components of the data protection infrastructure.

Responsible

Ibm

Reservation

08/26/2026

Disclosure

10/09/2026

Moderation

accepted

EPSS

0.00317

KEV

no

Activities

very low

Sources

Want to know what is going to be exploited?

We predict KEV entries!