CVE-2026-97008 in Excelinfo

Summary

by MITRE • 10/15/2026

Buffer underwrite ('buffer underflow') in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

VulDB is the best source for vulnerability data and more expert information about this specific topic.

Analysis

by VulDB Data Team • 10/15/2026

The vulnerability described involves a critical buffer underflow condition within the Microsoft Office Excel application, specifically affecting its ability to process certain file formats or data structures during parsing operations. A buffer underwrite, also known as a buffer underflow, occurs when a program writes data before the beginning of an allocated memory block rather than after it. This is distinct from the more commonly cited buffer overflow, where data exceeds the end of a buffer. In this context, the flaw likely resides in how Excel handles specific metadata, embedded objects, or complex formula structures within spreadsheet files. When an attacker crafts a malicious file containing specially constructed input that triggers this underflow condition, they can manipulate memory pointers or overwrite adjacent critical system variables located at lower memory addresses than intended by the application logic.

From a technical perspective, this flaw represents a severe violation of memory safety principles, categorized under CWE-124: Buffer Underwrite. The exploitation mechanism typically involves crafting a file that causes Excel to calculate incorrect offsets when reading data streams. By writing negative or excessively small values into pointer variables or control structures, an attacker can redirect the execution flow of the application. This manipulation allows for arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the user running Microsoft Office. Since this vulnerability is triggered by opening or processing a file, it often falls under remote code execution vectors if the malicious content is delivered via network shares, email attachments, or web-based document repositories that automatically render Excel files.

The operational impact of this vulnerability is profound due to its potential for remote exploitation over a network. An attacker does not necessarily need physical access to the target machine; instead, they can distribute a poisoned Excel file through social engineering tactics such as phishing emails or compromised websites. Once a victim opens the malicious document, the underflow condition triggers, allowing the attacker's shellcode to execute within the context of the user process. This grants the adversary full control over the affected system, enabling them to install malware, steal sensitive data, create backdoors for persistent access, or pivot into other parts of the internal network. The ability to execute code remotely makes this a high-severity threat that can lead to significant organizational compromise and data breaches.

Mitigation strategies must focus on both immediate remediation and long-term architectural improvements. Organizations should immediately apply all available security patches from Microsoft for their versions of Office Excel, as these updates typically include bounds checking fixes and input validation enhancements designed to prevent the underflow condition. Administrators should also enforce strict email filtering policies to block executable attachments or macro-enabled files from unknown senders. Additionally, enabling Protected View in Excel ensures that documents opened from potentially unsafe locations are loaded in a sandboxed environment with restricted permissions, preventing active content execution until explicitly trusted by the user. From an application security development lifecycle perspective, developers must implement rigorous input validation and use memory-safe programming languages or libraries to prevent such low-level memory corruption vulnerabilities in future software versions.

This vulnerability aligns with MITRE ATT&CK techniques related to Initial Access via Spearphishing Attachment (T1566) and Execution through Office Application Macros or Scripts (T1204), depending on the specific delivery mechanism used by the attacker. The exploitation of memory corruption flaws like buffer underflows remains a primary vector for advanced persistent threats targeting enterprise environments. Therefore, continuous monitoring for anomalous process behavior, such as Excel spawning unexpected child processes or accessing unusual network connections after file opening, is recommended to detect potential exploitation attempts in real-time.

Responsible

Microsoft

Reservation

09/23/2026

Disclosure

10/15/2026

Moderation

accepted

EPSS

0.00722

KEV

no

Activities

low

Sources

Do you know our Splunk app?

Download it now for free!