CVE-2026-111608 in Jeepay
Summary
by MITRE • 10/16/2026
Jeepay through 3.2.9 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability that allows authenticated merchant users to delete other merchants' division receivers by exploiting an ownership check on the wrong column. Attackers holding ENT_DIVISION_RECEIVER_DELETE who own a receiver group whose id matches a victim's receiver id can delete the victim's profit-sharing receiver.
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Analysis
by VulDB Data Team • 10/16/2026
The vulnerability identified in Jeepay versions up to 3.2.9 represents a classic insecure direct object reference (IDOR) flaw, specifically categorized under CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key. This security defect arises from an improper implementation of access control mechanisms within the application's backend logic. The core issue lies in how the system validates ownership for sensitive operations involving merchant division receivers. Instead of verifying that the authenticated user is the legitimate owner of the specific resource being targeted, the application performs its authorization check against a different column or identifier than the one used to locate and manipulate the data object. This mismatch creates a critical gap where an attacker can bypass intended security restrictions by manipulating input parameters to reference resources they do not own.
From a technical perspective, the vulnerability allows authenticated merchant users with the ENT_DIVISION_RECEIVER_DELETE permission to exploit this logic error. The attack vector relies on the correlation between two distinct identifiers: the identifier associated with the receiver group owned by the attacker and the unique identifier of the victim's profit-sharing receiver. If an attacker possesses a receiver group whose internal ID happens to match or map incorrectly to the target victim's receiver ID during the authorization check, the system erroneously grants permission for deletion. This means that even though the user does not own the specific division receiver they intend to delete, the flawed ownership verification logic treats them as authorized because of this identifier collision. The exploitation requires no complex injection techniques or buffer overflows; it simply involves crafting a request with the victim's receiver ID while ensuring the associated group ID satisfies the broken validation rule.
The operational impact of this vulnerability is severe for affected merchants and the platform itself. Successful exploitation allows an attacker to permanently delete other merchants' profit-sharing receivers, which are critical components for financial distribution and settlement processes within the Jeepay ecosystem. This action can lead to significant financial loss for victims by disrupting their ability to receive funds or manage their divisional payouts. Furthermore, it compromises the integrity of transaction records and may cause cascading failures in downstream accounting systems that rely on accurate receiver data. The lack of proper authorization checks undermines trust in the platform's security posture and exposes businesses to potential fraud and operational disruption without any legitimate administrative intervention.
To mitigate this vulnerability, immediate patching to a version later than 3.2.9 is required, as the developer has addressed the flawed ownership verification logic. In the interim, or for systems that cannot be immediately updated, administrators should implement strict input validation and enforce object-level access controls at every step of data manipulation. It is essential to ensure that authorization checks are performed against the actual resource identifier being accessed rather than any auxiliary or related identifiers. Additionally, implementing robust logging and monitoring for deletion events can help detect anomalous patterns indicative of IDOR exploitation. Adhering to industry standards such as OWASP Top 10 guidelines regarding broken access control is crucial for preventing similar issues in future development cycles. Security teams should also conduct regular code reviews focusing on authorization logic to ensure that ownership checks are consistently applied to the correct data entities, thereby aligning with ATT&CK techniques related to privilege escalation and unauthorized resource modification.