| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 7.1 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability has been found in Mozilla Firefox up to 28.0.1 and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component XBL Object Handler. This manipulation causes memory corruption. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2014-1524. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no available exploit. The affected component should be upgraded.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Mozilla Firefox up to 28.0.1 (Web Browser). It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown part of the component XBL Object Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a memory corruption vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-119. The product performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer. As an impact it is known to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The summary by CVE is:
The nsXBLProtoImpl::InstallImplementation function in Mozilla Firefox before 29.0, Firefox ESR 24.x before 24.5, Thunderbird before 24.5, and SeaMonkey before 2.26 does not properly check whether objects are XBL objects, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer overflow) via crafted JavaScript code that accesses a non-XBL object as if it were an XBL object.
The weakness was presented 04/29/2014 by Abhishek Arya (Inferno) with Google Chrome Security Team as MFSA2014-38 as confirmed advisory (Website). The advisory is shared at mozilla.org. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2014-1524 since 01/16/2014. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploitation doesn't need any form of authentication. It demands that the victim is doing some kind of user interaction. Neither technical details nor an exploit are publicly available.
The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 73790 (CentOS 5 / 6 : firefox (CESA-2014:0448)), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family CentOS Local Security Checks. The commercial vulnerability scanner Qualys is able to test this issue with plugin 122056 (Red Hat Update for Xulrunner firefox (RHSA-2014:0448)).
Upgrading to version 29.0 eliminates this vulnerability. A possible mitigation has been published immediately after the disclosure of the vulnerability.
The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (92851), Tenable (73790), SecurityFocus (BID 67131†), Secunia (SA58344†) and SecurityTracker (ID 1030165†). Additional details are provided at bugzilla.mozilla.org. See VDB-13101, VDB-13100, VDB-13099 and VDB-13098 for similar entries. If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.
Affected
- Mozilla Firefox up to 28.0.1
- Mozilla Firefox ESR up to 24.4
- Mozilla Thunderbird up to 24.4
- Mozilla Seamonkey up to 2.25
Product
Type
Vendor
Name
Version
License
Website
- Vendor: https://www.mozilla.org/
- Product: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.4VulDB Meta Temp Score: 7.1
VulDB Base Score: 5.0
VulDB Temp Score: 4.4
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 9.8
NVD Vector: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
NVD Base Score: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Memory corruptionCWE: CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes
Availability: 🔍
Status: Unproven
EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Nessus ID: 73790
Nessus Name: CentOS 5 / 6 : firefox (CESA-2014:0448)
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
OpenVAS ID: 702918
OpenVAS Name: Debian Security Advisory DSA 2918-1 (iceweasel - security update
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍
Qualys ID: 🔍
Qualys Name: 🔍
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: UpgradeStatus: 🔍
Reaction Time: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exposure Time: 🔍
Upgrade: Firefox 29.0
Timeline
01/16/2014 🔍04/29/2014 🔍
04/29/2014 🔍
04/29/2014 🔍
04/30/2014 🔍
04/30/2014 🔍
04/30/2014 🔍
04/30/2014 🔍
04/30/2014 🔍
05/01/2014 🔍
11/25/2025 🔍
Sources
Vendor: mozilla.orgProduct: mozilla.org
Advisory: MFSA2014-38
Researcher: Abhishek Arya (Inferno)
Organization: Google Chrome Security Team
Status: Confirmed
Confirmation: 🔍
CVE: CVE-2014-1524 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2014-1524
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-13093
OVAL: 🔍
IAVM: 🔍
X-Force: 92851 - Mozilla Firefox,Thunderbird and SeaMonkey nsXBLProtoImpl::InstallImplementation() buffer overflow, High Risk
SecurityFocus: 67131 - Mozilla Firefox/Thunderbird/SeaMonkey CVE-2014-1524 Remote Memory Corruption Vulnerability
Secunia: 58344 - Mozilla Firefox / Thunderbird / SeaMonkey Multiple Vulnerabilities, Highly Critical
SecurityTracker: 1030165 - Mozilla Thunderbird Multiple Flaws Let Remote Users Execute Arbitrary Code, Deny Service, and Conduct Cross-Site Scripting Attacks and Local Users Gain Elevated Privileges
Vulnerability Center: 44357 - Multiple Mozilla Products Code Execution Vulnerability via a Crafted JavaScript Code - CVE-2014-1524, Critical
Misc.: 🔍
See also: 🔍
Entry
Created: 04/30/2014 21:26Updated: 11/25/2025 21:04
Changes: 04/30/2014 21:26 (91), 01/31/2018 09:55 (6), 06/19/2021 07:57 (12), 06/19/2021 08:03 (1), 11/25/2025 21:04 (20)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103
If you want to get the best quality for vulnerability data then you always have to consider VulDB.

No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.