IBM Lotus Domino up to 7.0 Server BMP Image denial of service

CVSS Meta Temp Score
CVSS is a standardized scoring system to determine possibilities of attacks. The Temp Score considers temporal factors like disclosure, exploit and countermeasures. The unique Meta Score calculates the average score of different sources to provide a normalized scoring system.
Current Exploit Price (≈)
Our analysts are monitoring exploit markets and are in contact with vulnerability brokers. The range indicates the observed or calculated exploit price to be seen on exploit markets. A good indicator to understand the monetary effort required for and the popularity of an attack.
CTI Interest Score
Our Cyber Threat Intelligence team is monitoring different web sites, mailing lists, exploit markets and social media networks. The CTI Interest Score identifies the interest of attackers and the security community for this specific vulnerability in real-time. A high score indicates an elevated risk to be targeted for this vulnerability.
6.5$0-$5k0.00

Summaryinfo

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in IBM Lotus Domino up to 7.0. This affects an unknown function of the component Server. Executing a manipulation as part of BMP Image can lead to denial of service. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2006-0580. No exploit exists. The application of restrictive firewalling is recommended.

Detailsinfo

A vulnerability was found in IBM Lotus Domino up to 7.0 (Groupware Software). It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects some unknown functionality of the component Server. The manipulation as part of a BMP Image leads to a denial of service vulnerability. The CWE definition for the vulnerability is CWE-404. The product does not release or incorrectly releases a resource before it is made available for re-use. As an impact it is known to affect availability. CVE summarizes:

IBM Lotus Domino Server 7.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via a crafted packet to the LDAP port (389/TCP).

The bug was discovered 02/07/2006. The weakness was disclosed 02/07/2006 by Evgeny Legerov with GLEG Ltd. (Website). The advisory is shared for download at lists.immunitysec.com. This vulnerability was named CVE-2006-0580 since 02/08/2006. The attack can be initiated remotely. No form of authentication is required for a successful exploitation. There are neither technical details nor an exploit publicly available.

It is declared as proof-of-concept. The vulnerability scanner Nessus provides a plugin with the ID 20890 (Lotus Domino LDAP Server Crafted Packet Remote DoS), which helps to determine the existence of the flaw in a target environment. It is assigned to the family Denial of Service and running in the context r.

Applying a patch is able to eliminate this problem. The bugfix is ready for download at ibm.com.Proper firewalling of is able to address this issue. The best possible mitigation is suggested to be applying a restrictive firewalling. Furthermore it is possible to detect and prevent this kind of attack with TippingPoint and the filter 8936.

The vulnerability is also documented in the databases at X-Force (24518), Tenable (20890), SecurityFocus (BID 16523†), OSVDB (55136†) and Secunia (SA18738†). The entries VDB-2038 and VDB-2040 are pretty similar. VulDB is the best source for vulnerability data and more expert information about this specific topic.

Productinfo

Type

Vendor

Name

Version

License

Website

CPE 2.3info

CPE 2.2info

CVSSv4info

VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv3info

VulDB Meta Base Score: 7.5
VulDB Meta Temp Score: 6.5

VulDB Base Score: 7.5
VulDB Temp Score: 6.5
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

CVSSv2info

AVACAuCIA
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
💳💳💳💳💳💳
VectorComplexityAuthenticationConfidentialityIntegrityAvailability
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
UnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍

NVD Base Score: 🔍

Exploitinginfo

Class: Denial of service
CWE: CWE-404
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍

Physical: No
Local: No
Remote: Yes

Availability: 🔍
Status: Proof-of-Concept

EPSS Score: 🔍
EPSS Percentile: 🔍

Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍

0-DayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock
TodayUnlockUnlockUnlockUnlock

Nessus ID: 20890
Nessus Name: Lotus Domino LDAP Server Crafted Packet Remote DoS
Nessus File: 🔍
Nessus Risk: 🔍
Nessus Family: 🔍
Nessus Context: 🔍

OpenVAS ID: 20890
OpenVAS Name: Lotus Domino LDAP Server Denial of Service Vulnerability
OpenVAS File: 🔍
OpenVAS Family: 🔍

Threat Intelligenceinfo

Interest: 🔍
Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍

Countermeasuresinfo

Recommended: Firewall
Status: 🔍

0-Day Time: 🔍

Patch: ibm.com
Suricata ID: 100000229
Suricata Class: 🔍
Suricata Message: 🔍

TippingPoint: 🔍

McAfee IPS: 🔍
McAfee IPS Version: 🔍

PaloAlto IPS: 🔍
Fortigate IPS: 🔍

Timelineinfo

02/07/2006 🔍
02/07/2006 +0 days 🔍
02/07/2006 +0 days 🔍
02/07/2006 +0 days 🔍
02/07/2006 +0 days 🔍
02/07/2006 +0 days 🔍
02/07/2006 +0 days 🔍
02/08/2006 +1 days 🔍
02/13/2006 +5 days 🔍
02/13/2006 +0 days 🔍
02/21/2006 +8 days 🔍
06/18/2009 +1213 days 🔍
06/14/2019 +3647 days 🔍

Sourcesinfo

Vendor: ibm.com

Advisory: lists.immunitysec.com
Researcher: Evgeny Legerov
Organization: GLEG Ltd.
Status: Confirmed

CVE: CVE-2006-0580 (🔍)
GCVE (CVE): GCVE-0-2006-0580
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-2032
X-Force: 24518 - IBM Lotus Domino LDAP denial of service, Medium Risk
SecurityFocus: 16523 - Lotus Domino LDAP Denial of Service Vulnerability
Secunia: 18738 - IBM Lotus Domino LDAP Server Denial of Service Vulnerability, Less Critical
OSVDB: 55136 - Lotus Domino LDAP Server Crafted Packet Remote DoS
SecurityTracker: 1015592
Vulnerability Center: 10401 - IBM Lotus Domino LDAP Server DoS, High
Vupen: ADV-2006-0458

See also: 🔍

Entryinfo

Created: 02/13/2006 11:34
Updated: 06/14/2019 11:32
Changes: 02/13/2006 11:34 (105), 06/14/2019 11:32 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Cache ID: 216::103

VulDB is the best source for vulnerability data and more expert information about this specific topic.

Discussion

No comments yet. Languages: en.

Please log in to comment.

◂ PreviousOverviewNext ▸

Interested in the pricing of exploits?

See the underground prices here!