| CVSS Meta Temp Score | Current Exploit Price (≈) | CTI Interest Score |
|---|---|---|
| 5.6 | $0-$5k | 0.00 |
Summary
A vulnerability was found in Python. It has been classified as problematic. Impacted is the function graph of the component rrdtool Module Format String. Performing a manipulation results in format string.
Furthermore, an exploit is available.
Details
A vulnerability was found in Python (Programming Language Software) (unknown version). It has been classified as problematic. This affects the function graph of the component rrdtool Module Format String. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to a format string vulnerability. CWE is classifying the issue as CWE-134. The product uses a function that accepts a format string as an argument, but the format string originates from an external source. This is going to have an impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
The weakness was published 04/18/2013 by Thomas Pollet as not defined mailinglist post (oss-sec). It is possible to read the advisory at openwall.com. The vendor was not involved in the public release. Attacking locally is a requirement. No form of authentication is needed for exploitation. Technical details and a public exploit are known.
After immediately, there has been an exploit disclosed. It is declared as proof-of-concept.
There is no information about possible countermeasures known. It may be suggested to replace the affected object with an alternative product.
The vulnerability is also documented in the vulnerability database at OSVDB (92570†). Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
Product
Type
Name
License
CPE 2.3
CPE 2.2
CVSSv4
VulDB Vector: 🔍VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv3
VulDB Meta Base Score: 5.9VulDB Meta Temp Score: 5.6
VulDB Base Score: 5.9
VulDB Temp Score: 5.6
VulDB Vector: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
CVSSv2
| AV | AC | Au | C | I | A |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 | 💳 |
| Vector | Complexity | Authentication | Confidentiality | Integrity | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
| Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
VulDB Base Score: 🔍
VulDB Temp Score: 🔍
VulDB Reliability: 🔍
Exploiting
Class: Format stringCWE: CWE-134 / CWE-119
CAPEC: 🔍
ATT&CK: 🔍
Physical: Partially
Local: Yes
Remote: No
Availability: 🔍
Access: Public
Status: Proof-of-Concept
Price Prediction: 🔍
Current Price Estimation: 🔍
| 0-Day | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock | Unlock |
Threat Intelligence
Interest: 🔍Active Actors: 🔍
Active APT Groups: 🔍
Countermeasures
Recommended: no mitigation knownStatus: 🔍
0-Day Time: 🔍
Exploit Delay Time: 🔍
Timeline
04/18/2013 🔍04/18/2013 🔍
04/23/2013 🔍
04/17/2018 🔍
Sources
Advisory: openwall.comResearcher: Thomas Pollet
Status: Not defined
GCVE (VulDB): GCVE-100-8475
OSVDB: 92570
scip Labs: https://www.scip.ch/en/?labs.20161013
Entry
Created: 04/23/2013 11:10Updated: 04/17/2018 10:31
Changes: 04/23/2013 11:10 (42), 04/17/2018 10:31 (2)
Complete: 🔍
Committer: olku
Cache ID: 216:ED8:103
Statistical analysis made it clear that VulDB provides the best quality for vulnerability data.
No comments yet. Languages: en.
Please log in to comment.